CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 6.1-9
Assault in the Second Degree (Serious Physical Injury) -- § 53a-60 (a) (1)
The defendant is charged [in count __] with assault in the second degree. The statute defining
this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:
a person is guilty of assault in the second degree when with intent to cause serious
physical injury to another person, (he/she) causes such injury to such person or to a
third person.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements
beyond a reasonable doubt:
Element 1 - Intent to cause serious physical injury
The first element is that the defendant specifically intended to cause serious physical injury to
another person. A person acts “intentionally” with respect to a result when (his/her) conscious
objective is to cause such result. <See Intent: Specific, Instruction 2.3-1.>
“Serious physical injury” is something more serious than mere physical injury, which is defined
as “impairment of physical condition or pain.” It is more than a minor or superficial injury. It is
defined by statute as “physical injury which creates a substantial risk of death, or which causes
serious disfigurement, serious impairment of health or serious loss or impairment of the function
of any bodily organ.”
Element 2 - Caused serious physical injury
The second element is that, acting with that intent, the defendant caused serious physical injury
to that person or to a third person. This means that the defendant’s conduct was the proximate
cause of <insert name of person injured>’s injuries. You must find it proved beyond a
reasonable doubt that <insert name of person injured> was injured as a result of the actions of
the defendant. <See Proximate Cause, Instruction 2.6-1.>
[<If person injured was not the person intended:> It does not matter whether <insert name of
person injured> was the person upon whom the defendant intended to inflict serious physical
injury. It is sufficient if you find that the defendant intended to cause serious physical injury to
another person and that (he/she) in fact caused serious physical injury to that person or to some
other person.]
Conclusion
In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant had the
specific intent to cause serious physical injury to another person <insert name of person, if
applicable>, and 2) the defendant did cause serious physical injury to <insert name of person
injured>.
If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements
of the crime of assault in the second degree, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the
other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt
any of the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
78dc78249e2a6f3052e7de2b0330fac51839eda551e5df415a57b4aa155396a7
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.