CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 6.1-3
Assault in the First Degree (Reckless Indifference) -- § 53a-59 (a) (3)
The defendant is charged [in count __] with assault in the first degree. The statute defining
this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:
a person is guilty of assault in the first degree when under circumstances evincing an
extreme indifference to human life (he/she) recklessly engages in conduct which
creates a risk of death to another person, and thereby causes serious physical injury to
another person.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements
beyond a reasonable doubt:
Element 1 - Conduct creating a risk of death
The first element is that the defendant engaged in conduct that created a risk of death.
Element 2 - Recklessness
The second element is that the defendant acted recklessly. A person acts “recklessly” with
respect to a result or circumstances when (he/she) is aware of and consciously disregards a
substantial and unjustifiable risk that such result will occur or that such circumstances exist.
<See Recklessness, Instruction 2.3-4.>
Element 3 - Extreme indifference to human life
The third element is that the defendant acted under circumstances evincing an extreme
indifference to human life. “Indifference” means simply not caring. It means lacking any
interest in a matter one way or the other. Extreme means existing in the highest or greatest
possible degree. Extreme indifference is more than ordinary indifference. It is synonymous with
excessive and is the greatest departure from the ordinary. What evinces an extreme indifference
to human life is a question of fact.
Element 4 - Caused serious physical injury
The fourth element is that the defendant caused serious physical injury to another person. This
means that the defendant’s conduct was the proximate cause of the person’s injuries. You must
find it proved beyond a reasonable doubt that <insert name of person injured> was injured as a
result of the actions of the defendant. <See Proximate Cause, Instruction 2.6-1.>
“Serious physical injury” is something more serious than mere physical injury, which is defined
as “impairment of physical condition or pain.” It is more than a minor or superficial injury. It is
defined by statute as “physical injury which creates a substantial risk of death, or which causes
serious disfigurement, serious impairment of health or serious loss or impairment of the function
of any bodily organ.”
Conclusion
In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant engaged in
conduct that created a risk of death, 2) (he/she) acted recklessly, 3) (he/she) acted under
circumstances evincing an extreme indifference to human life, and 4) (he/she) caused serious
physical injury to <insert name of person injured>.
If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements
of the crime of assault in the first degree, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the other
hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of
the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
de19d0ad8598eee309ab8f22383c70a96472259e78e93277905411b73dc370be
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.