Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 6.1-19

Assault in the Third Degree (Reckless) -- § 53a-61 (a) (2)

activein force · 2007-12-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant is charged [in count __] with assault in the third degree. The statute defining

this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:

a person is guilty of assault in the third degree when (he/she) recklessly causes

serious physical injury to another person.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements

beyond a reasonable doubt:

Element 1 - Recklessness

The first element is that the defendant acted recklessly. A person acts “recklessly” with respect

to a result or circumstances when (he/she) is aware of and consciously disregards a substantial

and unjustifiable risk that such result will occur or that such circumstances exist. <Insert

Recklessness, Instruction 2.3-4.>

Element 2 - Caused serious physical injury

The second element is that the defendant’s reckless acts caused serious physical injury to another

person. This means that the defendant’s conduct was the proximate cause of the person’s

injuries. You must find it proved beyond a reasonable doubt that <insert name of person

injured> was injured as a result of the actions of the defendant. <See Proximate Cause,

Instruction 2.6-1.>

“Serious physical injury” is something more serious than mere physical injury, which is defined

as “impairment of physical condition or pain.” It is more than a minor or superficial injury. It is

defined by statute as “physical injury which creates a substantial risk of death, or which causes

serious disfigurement, serious impairment of health or serious loss or impairment of the function

of any bodily organ.”

Conclusion

In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant acted

recklessly, and 2) the defendant caused serious physical injury to <insert name of person

injured>.

If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements

of the crime of assault in the third degree, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the other

hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of

the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
c7d8ac08d3d9373938eb19becb963d81cc2fc6b9c1aaa8b891f8cdcc3a0d7f40
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.