CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 6.1-19
Assault in the Third Degree (Reckless) -- § 53a-61 (a) (2)
The defendant is charged [in count __] with assault in the third degree. The statute defining
this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:
a person is guilty of assault in the third degree when (he/she) recklessly causes
serious physical injury to another person.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements
beyond a reasonable doubt:
Element 1 - Recklessness
The first element is that the defendant acted recklessly. A person acts “recklessly” with respect
to a result or circumstances when (he/she) is aware of and consciously disregards a substantial
and unjustifiable risk that such result will occur or that such circumstances exist. <Insert
Recklessness, Instruction 2.3-4.>
Element 2 - Caused serious physical injury
The second element is that the defendant’s reckless acts caused serious physical injury to another
person. This means that the defendant’s conduct was the proximate cause of the person’s
injuries. You must find it proved beyond a reasonable doubt that <insert name of person
injured> was injured as a result of the actions of the defendant. <See Proximate Cause,
Instruction 2.6-1.>
“Serious physical injury” is something more serious than mere physical injury, which is defined
as “impairment of physical condition or pain.” It is more than a minor or superficial injury. It is
defined by statute as “physical injury which creates a substantial risk of death, or which causes
serious disfigurement, serious impairment of health or serious loss or impairment of the function
of any bodily organ.”
Conclusion
In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant acted
recklessly, and 2) the defendant caused serious physical injury to <insert name of person
injured>.
If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements
of the crime of assault in the third degree, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the other
hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of
the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
c7d8ac08d3d9373938eb19becb963d81cc2fc6b9c1aaa8b891f8cdcc3a0d7f40
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.