CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 6.1-18
Assault in the Third Degree (Physical Injury) -- § 53a-61 (a) (1)
The defendant is charged [in count __] with assault in the third degree. The statute defining
this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:
a person is guilty of assault in the third degree when with intent to cause physical
injury to another person, (he/she) causes such injury to such person or to a third
person.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements
beyond a reasonable doubt:
Element 1 - Intent to cause physical injury
The first element is that the defendant specifically intended to cause physical injury to another
person. A person acts “intentionally” with respect to a result when (his/her) conscious objective
is to cause such result. <See Intent: Specific, Instruction 2.3-1.>
“Physical injury” is defined as impairment of physical condition or pain. It is a reduced ability to
act as one would otherwise have acted. The law does not require that the injury be serious. It
may be minor.
Element 2 - Caused physical injury
The second element is that the defendant caused physical injury to another person. This means
that the defendant’s conduct was the proximate cause of the person’s injuries. You must find it
proved beyond a reasonable doubt that <insert name of person injured> was injured as a result of
the actions of the defendant. <See Proximate Cause, Instruction 2.6-1.>
[<If person injured was not the person intended:> It does not matter whether <insert name of
person injured> was the person upon whom the defendant intended to inflict physical injury. It
is sufficient if you find that the defendant intended to cause physical injury to another person and
that (he/she) in fact caused physical injury to that person or to some other person.]
Conclusion
In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant had the
specific intent to cause physical injury to another person <insert name of person, if applicable>,
and 2) the defendant caused physical injury to <insert name of person injured>.
If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements
of the crime of assault in the third degree, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the other
hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of
the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
faddb6770e4f56712e0330eea0386db906d8aab0e6bed36d9e321a26409d6e33
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.