CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 6.1-14
Assault in the Second Degree (Knockout) -- §
53a-60 (a) (6)
New, November 6, 2014
The defendant is charged [in count __] with assault in the second degree. The statute defining
this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:
a person is guilty of assault in the second degree when, with intent to cause serious
physical injury to another person by rendering such other person unconscious, and
without provocation by such other person, (he/she) causes such injury to such other
person by striking such other person on the head.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements
beyond a reasonable doubt:
Element 1 - Intent to cause serious physical injury
The first element is that the defendant intended to cause serious physical injury to a person by
rendering that person unconscious. A person acts “intentionally” with respect to a result when
(his/her) conscious objective is to cause such result. <See Intent: Specific, Instruction 2.3-1.>
Element 2 - Caused serious physical injury
The second element is that the defendant in fact caused serious physical injury to a person by
striking that person on the head. This means that the defendant’s conduct was the proximate
cause of the person’s injuries. You must find it proved beyond a reasonable doubt that <insert
name of person injured> was injured as a result of the actions of the defendant. <See Proximate
Cause, Instruction 2.6-1.>
“Serious physical injury” is something more serious than mere physical injury, which is defined
as “impairment of physical condition or pain.” It is more than a minor or superficial injury. It is
defined by statute as “physical injury which creates a substantial risk of death, or which causes
serious disfigurement, serious impairment of health or serious loss or impairment of the function
of any bodily organ.”
Element 3 - Without provocation
The third element is that the defendant was not provoked by the other person.
Conclusion
In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant intended to
cause serious physical injury to <insert name of person injured> by rendering (him/her)
unconscious, 2) the defendant caused serious physical injury to <insert name of person injured>
by striking (him/her) on the head, and 3) <insert name of person injured> did not provoke the
defendant.
If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements
of the crime of assault in the second degree, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the
other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt
any of the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
e6ac95b93aa5f7ab61a949505da1b18fc3a46892cc7f276c928f58e41b2277d6
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.