Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 6.1-14

Assault in the Second Degree (Knockout) -- §

activein force · 2026-08-23 – presentas-observed

53a-60 (a) (6)

New, November 6, 2014

The defendant is charged [in count __] with assault in the second degree. The statute defining

this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:

a person is guilty of assault in the second degree when, with intent to cause serious

physical injury to another person by rendering such other person unconscious, and

without provocation by such other person, (he/she) causes such injury to such other

person by striking such other person on the head.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements

beyond a reasonable doubt:

Element 1 - Intent to cause serious physical injury

The first element is that the defendant intended to cause serious physical injury to a person by

rendering that person unconscious. A person acts “intentionally” with respect to a result when

(his/her) conscious objective is to cause such result. <See Intent: Specific, Instruction 2.3-1.>

Element 2 - Caused serious physical injury

The second element is that the defendant in fact caused serious physical injury to a person by

striking that person on the head. This means that the defendant’s conduct was the proximate

cause of the person’s injuries. You must find it proved beyond a reasonable doubt that <insert

name of person injured> was injured as a result of the actions of the defendant. <See Proximate

Cause, Instruction 2.6-1.>

“Serious physical injury” is something more serious than mere physical injury, which is defined

as “impairment of physical condition or pain.” It is more than a minor or superficial injury. It is

defined by statute as “physical injury which creates a substantial risk of death, or which causes

serious disfigurement, serious impairment of health or serious loss or impairment of the function

of any bodily organ.”

Element 3 - Without provocation

The third element is that the defendant was not provoked by the other person.

Conclusion

In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant intended to

cause serious physical injury to <insert name of person injured> by rendering (him/her)

unconscious, 2) the defendant caused serious physical injury to <insert name of person injured>

by striking (him/her) on the head, and 3) <insert name of person injured> did not provoke the

defendant.

If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements

of the crime of assault in the second degree, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the

other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt

any of the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
e6ac95b93aa5f7ab61a949505da1b18fc3a46892cc7f276c928f58e41b2277d6
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.