CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 6.1-13
Assault in the Second Degree (Board of Parole Employee or Member) -- § 53a-60 (a) (5)
The defendant is charged [in count __] with assault in the second degree. The statute defining
this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:
a person is guilty of assault in the second degree when (he/she) is a parolee from a
correctional institution and with intent to cause physical injury to an employee or
member of the board of parole, (he/she) causes physical injury to such employee or
member.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements
beyond a reasonable doubt:
Element 1 - On parole
The first element is that the defendant was, at the time of the alleged offense, on parole from a
correctional institution. This means (he/she) was released from a correctional institution prior to
the expiration of (his/her) term of imprisonment but remains under the supervision of the board
of parole.
Element 2 - Intent to cause physical injury
The second element is that the defendant intended to cause physical injury to a person known by
the defendant to be an employee or member of the board of parole. A person acts
“intentionally” with respect to a result when (his/her) conscious objective is to cause such result.
<See Intent: Specific, Instruction 2.3-1.>
Element 3 - Caused physical injury
The third element is that the defendant in fact caused physical injury to an employee or member
of the board of parole. This means that the defendant’s conduct was the proximate cause of the
person’s injuries. You must find it proved beyond a reasonable doubt that <insert name of
person injured> was injured as a result of the actions of the defendant. <See Proximate Cause,
Instruction 2.6-1.>
“Physical injury” is defined as impairment of physical condition or pain. It is a reduced ability to
act as one would otherwise have acted. The law does not require that the injury be serious. It
may be minor.
Conclusion
In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant was a parolee
from a correctional institution, 2) the defendant intended to cause physical injury to <insert name
of person injured>, whom (he/she) knew to be an employee or member of the board of parole,
and 3) the defendant caused physical injury to <insert name of person injured>.
If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements
of the crime of assault in the second degree, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the
other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt
any of the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
42589b47c22a09b71792f4dc891e2ad7b45b3b151920fba6b581df9e2514caa9
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.