CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 5.1-2
Manslaughter in the First Degree (Intentional) -- § 53a-55 (a) (1)
The defendant is charged [in count __] with manslaughter in the first degree. The statute
defining this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:
a person is guilty of manslaughter in the first degree when with intent to cause serious
physical injury to another person, (he/she) causes the death of such person or of a
third person.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements
beyond a reasonable doubt:
Element 1 - Intent to cause serious physical injury
The first element is that the defendant specifically intended to cause serious physical injury to
another person. “Serious physical injury” is something more serious than mere physical injury,
which is defined as “impairment of physical condition or pain.” It is more than a minor or
superficial injury. It is defined by statute as “physical injury which creates a substantial risk of
death, or which causes serious disfigurement, serious impairment of health or serious loss or
impairment of the function of any bodily organ.” You will note that the basis of the charge
under this statute is not that the defendant intended to kill, but that he intended to inflict serious
physical injury.
A person acts “intentionally” with respect to a result when (his/her) conscious objective is to
cause such result. <See Intent: Specific, Instruction 2.3-1.>
The intent to cause serious physical injury may be inferred from circumstantial evidence. <See
Evidence of Intent, Instruction 2.3-2.>
Element 2 - Caused death
The second element is that the defendant, acting with the intent to cause serious physical injury
to another person, caused the death of <insert name of decedent>.
[<If transferred intent is applicable:> It is not necessary for a conviction of intentional
manslaughter that the state prove that the defendant intended to kill the person whom (he/she)
did in fact kill. It is sufficient if the state proves that, acting with the intent to cause serious
physical injury to a person, (he/she) in fact killed a person.]
This means that the defendant’s conduct was the proximate cause of the decedent’s death. You
must find it proved beyond a reasonable doubt that <insert name of decedent> died as a result of
the actions of the defendant. <See Proximate Cause, Instruction 2.6-1.>
Conclusion
In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant intended to
cause serious physical injury to another person, and 2) in accordance with that intent, the
defendant caused the death of <insert name of decedent>.
If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements
of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the
other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt
any of the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
fb2745c8e37a5d88a1c078c3732d19f0e9dfcf40db9d34442b7c350b35b89e2c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.