Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 4.4-4

Failure to Appear in the Second Degree (While on Probation) -- § 53a-173 (a) (2)1

activein force · 2022-11-14 – presentas-observed

The defendant is charged [in count __] with failure to appear in the second degree. The statute

defining this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:

a person is guilty of failure to appear in the second degree when while on probation

for conviction of a (misdemeanor / motor vehicle violation), (he/she) wilfuly fails to

appear when legally called for any court hearing relating to a violation of such

probation.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements

beyond a reasonable doubt:

Element 1 - On probation

The first element is that the defendant was on probation for a conviction of a (misdemeanor /

motor vehicle violation). I instruct you, as a matter of law, that the crime of <insert underlying

charge> is a (misdemeanor / motor vehicle violation).

Element 2 - Duty to appear

The second element is that on <insert date>, the defendant was required to appear before (a court

or judicial officer) in connection with the charge of violation of probation.

Element 3 - Failure to appear

The third element is that the defendant wilfully failed to appear as required. An act is done

wilfully if done knowingly, intentionally, and deliberately. In order to prove this element, the

state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt either that the defendant received and knowingly,

intentionally, and deliberately ignored a notice to appear or that the defendant knowingly,

intentionally, and deliberately embarked on a course of conduct designed to prevent (him/her)

from receiving such notice.

2 <See Knowledge, Instruction 2.3-3.>

Conclusion

In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant was on

probation for a conviction of a (misdemeanor / motor vehicle violation), 2) (he/she) was required

to appear on <insert date> in connection with the charge of violation of probation, and 3)

(he/she) wilfully failed to appear.

If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements

of the crime of failure to appear, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the other hand, if

you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of the

elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.

1 Note: The degree of the offense depends on the classification of the underlying crime. See

General Statutes §§ 53a-172 (first degree: felony); 53a-173 (second degree: misdemeanor or

motor vehicle violation for which a sentence of a term of imprisonment may be imposed).

2 State v. Cerilli, 222 Conn. 556, 583-84 (1992).

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
916a84fbf74df6c7943fb3d9c1a2aa5d0f7ceaf30f6d4814a18aa2d4c9d08a24
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 4.4-4 — Failure to Appear in… · binding.law