CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 4.4-4
Failure to Appear in the Second Degree (While on Probation) -- § 53a-173 (a) (2)1
The defendant is charged [in count __] with failure to appear in the second degree. The statute
defining this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:
a person is guilty of failure to appear in the second degree when while on probation
for conviction of a (misdemeanor / motor vehicle violation), (he/she) wilfuly fails to
appear when legally called for any court hearing relating to a violation of such
probation.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements
beyond a reasonable doubt:
Element 1 - On probation
The first element is that the defendant was on probation for a conviction of a (misdemeanor /
motor vehicle violation). I instruct you, as a matter of law, that the crime of <insert underlying
charge> is a (misdemeanor / motor vehicle violation).
Element 2 - Duty to appear
The second element is that on <insert date>, the defendant was required to appear before (a court
or judicial officer) in connection with the charge of violation of probation.
Element 3 - Failure to appear
The third element is that the defendant wilfully failed to appear as required. An act is done
wilfully if done knowingly, intentionally, and deliberately. In order to prove this element, the
state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt either that the defendant received and knowingly,
intentionally, and deliberately ignored a notice to appear or that the defendant knowingly,
intentionally, and deliberately embarked on a course of conduct designed to prevent (him/her)
from receiving such notice.
2 <See Knowledge, Instruction 2.3-3.>
Conclusion
In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant was on
probation for a conviction of a (misdemeanor / motor vehicle violation), 2) (he/she) was required
to appear on <insert date> in connection with the charge of violation of probation, and 3)
(he/she) wilfully failed to appear.
If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements
of the crime of failure to appear, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the other hand, if
you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of the
elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.
1 Note: The degree of the offense depends on the classification of the underlying crime. See
General Statutes §§ 53a-172 (first degree: felony); 53a-173 (second degree: misdemeanor or
motor vehicle violation for which a sentence of a term of imprisonment may be imposed).
2 State v. Cerilli, 222 Conn. 556, 583-84 (1992).
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
916a84fbf74df6c7943fb3d9c1a2aa5d0f7ceaf30f6d4814a18aa2d4c9d08a24
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.