CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 4.4-1
Failure to Appear in the First Degree (While
Released on Bail or a Promise to Appear) -- § 53a-
172 (a) (1)
Note: The degree of the offense depends on the classification of the underlying crime.
Compare Instruction 4.4-1 -- § 53a-172 (a) (1) (first degree: felony) with Instruction 4.4-2 --
§ 53a-173 (a) (1) (second degree: misdemeanor or motor vehicle violation for which a
sentence of a term of imprisonment may be imposed).
The defendant is charged [in count __] with failure to appear in the first degree. The statute
defining this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:
a person is guilty of failure to appear in the first degree when while charged with the
commission of a felony and while out on bail or released under other procedure of
law, (he/she) wilfully fails to appear when legally called according to the terms of
(his/her) bail bond or promise to appear.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements
beyond a reasonable doubt:
Element 1 - Released on bail or promise to appear
The first element is that the defendant was released on (bail / a promise to appear) upon the
condition that (he/she) appear personally in connection with (his/her) criminal proceeding at a
later date. The statute requires that the crime with which the defendant was charged when
(he/she) was released must be a felony. I instruct you, as a matter of law, that <insert underlying
charge> is a felony.
Element 2 - Duty to appear
The second element is that on <insert date>, the defendant was required to appear before (a court
/ judicial officer) in connection with the charge of <insert underlying charge>.
Element 3 - Failure to appear
The third element is that the defendant wilfully failed to appear as required. An act is done
wilfully if done knowingly, intentionally, and deliberately. To prove this element, the state must
prove beyond a reasonable doubt either that the defendant received and knowingly, intentionally,
and deliberately ignored a notice to appear or that the defendant knowingly, intentionally, and
deliberately embarked on a course of conduct designed to prevent (him/her)
from receiving such notice.
1 <See Knowledge, Instruction 2.3-3.>
Conclusion
In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant was released
on (bail / a promise to appear) on the condition that (he/she) appear personally in connection
with (his/her) criminal proceeding at a later date, 2) (he/she) was required to appear in court on
<insert date>, and 3) (he/she) wilfully failed to appear on that date.
If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements
of the crime of failure to appear in the first degree, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On
the other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable
doubt any of the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.
1 State v. Cerilli, 222 Conn. 556, 583-84 (1992).
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
b8597308ff582cf7a9a9ed97ed0dd1ecb62bb66abe6b0bb247e2e6c3b346fdd3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.