CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 4.1-8
Disclosure of Bid or Proposal
The defendant is charged [in count __] with disclosure of a bid or proposal. The statute
defining this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:
unless otherwise required by law, the prices quoted in a (bid / proposal) for any
contract to be awarded by any (commission, agency or department / political
subdivision) of the state shall not be disclosed by the (bidder / offeror) prior to the
(opening of a bid / the award of a proposal), directly or indirectly to any (other bidder
/ other offeror / competitor).
For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements
beyond a reasonable doubt:
Element 1 - Bidder/Offeror
The first element is that the defendant was a[n] (bidder / offeror) for a contract to be awarded by
any (commission, agency or department of the state / political subdivision) of the state. <Insert
the applicable definitions:>
• “Bidder” means a person, firm or corporation submitting a competitive bid in response to
a solicitation.
• “Offeror” means a person, firm or corporation submitting a proposal in response to a
request for proposals.2
• A “commission, agency or department of the state” includes any commission, agency,
department, officer, board, council, institution or other agency of the state government.3
• A “political subdivision of the state” means any city, town, borough, municipal
corporation, school district, regional district or other district or other political subdivision
of this state.
A (“bid” / “proposal”) means the submission of prices by persons, firms or corporations
competing for a contract to provide buildings, facilities, supplies, materials, equipment,
contractual services or any other facilities, goods or services.
Element 2 - Disclosed prices
The second element is that the defendant, either directly or indirectly, disclosed the prices quoted
in (his/her) (bid / proposal) to another (bidder / offeror / competitor) for the contract.
Element 3 - Prior to award
The third element is that the disclosure was made prior to the (opening of the bid / the award of
the proposal) by the commission, agency or department. <Insert the applicable definitions:>
• “Opening” means the public opening of a bid at the time stated in the notice soliciting
such bid.
• “Awarding” means the decision by the (commission, agency or department of the state /
political subdivision) to offer a contract to a[n] (bidder / offeror).
Element 4 - Intent to disclose
The fourth element is that the defendant intended to make the disclosure to another (bidder /
offeror / competitor). The state need only prove that the defendant intentionally and not
inadvertently or accidentally engaged in (his/her) actions, i.e., to make the disclosure. It does not
matter what the result of the disclosure was. A person acts “intentionally” with respect to a
result when (his/her) conscious objective is to cause such result. <See Intent: Specific,
Instruction 2.3-1.>
Conclusion
In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant was a[n]
(bidder / offeror) for a contract to be awarded by any (commission, agency or department of the
state / political subdivision) of the state, 2) the defendant, either directly or indirectly, disclosed
the prices quoted in (his/her) (bid / proposal) to another (bidder / offeror / competitor) for the
contract, 3) the disclosure was made prior to the (opening of the bid / the award of the proposal)
by the (commission / agency / department), and 4) the defendant intended to make the disclosure
to another (bidder / offeror / competitor).
If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements
of the crime of disclosure of a bid, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the other hand, if
you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of the
elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.
1 General Statutes § 4a-50 (6).
2 General Statutes § 4a-50 (7).
3 General Statutes § 4a-50 (1).
4 General Statutes § 1-200 (1) (A).
5 General Statutes § 4a-50 (4).
6 General Statutes § 2-71p (b) (2).
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
ba85d9683d8f5d433f52dcb00aaf3f23226eab7e95981fc6b23fe756f3b0b5a7
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.