Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 4.1-7

Bid Rigging

activein force · 2007-12-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant is charged [in count __] with bid rigging. The statute defining this offense reads

in pertinent part as follows:

no (person / firm / corporation / association / partnership) who bids, or intends to bid,

for any contract to be awarded by any (commission, agency, or department / political

subdivision) of the state shall induce or attempt to induce any other (person / firm /

corporation / association / partnership) (to submit / not to submit) a bid or proposal

for the purpose of restricting competition.

For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements

beyond a reasonable doubt:

Element 1 - Made or intended to make a bid

The first element is that the defendant was a[n] (person / firm / corporation / association /

partnership) who made a bid or intended to make a bid, for a contract to be awarded by any

(commission, agency, or department / political subdivision) of the state.

For purposes of this statute, “person” means a human being and, where appropriate, a public or

private corporation, a limited liability company, an unincorporated association, a partnership, or

a government or a governmental instrumentality. Under our law, a person is criminally liable

when (he/she) performs or causes to be performed in the name of or in behalf of a corporation or

a limited liability company, conduct constituting an offense.

The state must also prove that the defendant submitted a bid or intended to submit a bid for a

public contract. A “bid” or “proposal” means the submission of prices by persons, firms or

corporations competing for a contract to provide supplies, materials, equipment or contractual

services.

2 The intent to submit a bid does not require the actual submission of the bid. A person

acts “intentionally” with respect to a result when (his/her) conscious objective is to cause such

result. <See Intent: Specific, Instruction 2.3-1.>

<Insert the applicable definitions:>

• A “commission, agency or department of the state” includes any commission, agency,

department, officer, board, council, institution or other agency of the state government.

• A “political subdivision of the state” means any city, town, borough, municipal

corporation, school district, regional district or other district or other political subdivision

of this state.

Element 2 - Induced another

The second element is that the defendant induced or attempted to induce another (person / firm /

corporation / association / partnership) (to submit / not to submit) a bid or proposal for the

contract. “Induce” means to move to action by persuasion or by influence. Additionally, the

state must prove that the defendant submitted (his/her) bid or had the intent to submit a bid

before (he/she) induced or attempted to induce the other person or firm.

Element 3 - Intent to restrict competition

The third element is that the defendant specifically intended to restrict competition for the said

contract. “To restrict” means to limit.5 “Competition” means the effort or action of two or more

commercial interests to obtain the same business from third parties.6

Conclusion

In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant was a[n]

(person / firm / corporation / association / partnership) who bid or intended to bid, for a contract

to be awarded by any (commission, agency, or department / political subdivision) of the state, 2)

the defendant induced or attempted to induce another (person / firm / corporation / association /

partnership) (to submit / not to submit) a bid or proposal for said contract, and 3) the defendant

specifically intended to restrict competition for the said contract.

If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements

of the crime of bid rigging, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the other hand, if you

unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of the

elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.

1 General Statutes § 53a-11.

2 General Statutes § 4a-50 (4).

3 General Statutes § 4a-50 (1).

4 General Statutes § 1-200 (1) (A).

5 Black’s Law Dictionary (8th Ed. 2004).

6 Id.

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
0177661293748a956073df95d9939c57da34fd0324beba8c9280435f32d3f609
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 4.1-7 — Bid Rigging · binding.law