CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 3.2-1
Attempt -- § 53a-49 (a) (1)
The defendant is charged [in count __] with attempt to commit <insert substantive offense>.
The statute defining attempt reads in pertinent part as follows:
a person is guilty of an attempt to commit a crime if, acting with the kind of mental
state required for the commission of the crime, (he/she) intentionally engages in
conduct which would constitute the crime if attendant circumstances were as (he/she)
believes them to be.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements
beyond a reasonable doubt:
Element 1 - Intent
The first element is that the defendant had the kind of mental state required for commission of
the crime of <insert substantive offense>. The intent for that crime is the intent to <insert intent
required for substantive offense>.
Element 2 - Conduct
The second element is that the defendant intentionally engaged in conduct that would constitute
the crime of <insert substantive offensive> if attendant circumstances were as (he/she) believed
them to be. “Attendant circumstances” is generally understood to mean the facts surrounding an
event.
Conclusion
If, upon all the evidence, you conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant had formed
in (his/her) mind the intention to commit <insert substantive crime> as it has been defined for
you, you must next consider whether (he/she) intentionally did anything that would constitute the
crime if the circumstances were as (he/she) believed them to be. In other words, the state must
prove both intent and conduct beyond a reasonable doubt to obtain a conviction.
If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant
intended to commit <insert substantive crime> and engaged in conduct that would constitute that
crime if circumstances were as (he/she) believed them to be, then you shall find the defendant
guilty. On the other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a
reasonable doubt either of these elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
3d7796344813f8e17964a5e4e2fc8f894aea7982bb18d857a35e7e31720b84e2
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.