CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 2.5-3
Informant Testimony
A witness testified in this case as an informant. An informant is a witness who was incarcerated
either at the time (he/she) offered to testify, or at the time (he/she) provided testimony, about a
defendant’s inculpatory statements, regardless of where or when those inculpatory statements
were made.
Although the state is permitted to present the testimony of an informant, you must examine the
testimony of such a witness who provides evidence against a defendant with greater care and
caution than the testimony of an ordinary witness.
You should keep in mind that (he/she) may, in (his/her) own mind, be looking or hoping for
some favorable treatment in the sentence, supervision, or disposition of (his/her) own matters,
and therefore may have such an interest in the outcome of this case that (his/her) testimony may
have been colored by that fact. In considering the testimony of such a witness, you may consider
whether there was any motive developed in the evidence for (him/her) to testify falsely in
inculpating the accused.
The factors you may consider, among others, when evaluating the credibility of such a witness
include:
• the extent to which the witness’ testimony is confirmed by other evidence;
• the specificity of the testimony;
• the extent to which the testimony contains details known only by the perpetrator of the
alleged offense;
• the extent to which the details of the testimony could be obtained from a source other
than the defendant;
• the circumstances under which the witness initially provided information supporting such
testimony to law enforcement or a prosecutorial official;
• whether the witness has received a benefit, or expects to receive a benefit (including
immunity from prosecution, leniency in prosecution, leniency in sentencing, or personal
advantage) in exchange for testimony;
• any other case in which the witness testified or offered statements and whether the
witness received any promise, inducement or benefit in exchange for that testimony or
statement;
• whether the witness has ever changed (his/her) testimony; and
• the witness’ record of convictions.
You should carefully scrutinize the testimony of such a witness before you accept it. However,
you are not required to disbelieve a witness because (he/she) is an informant. Like all other
questions of credibility, this is an issue for you to determine based on all the evidence presented
to you.
It is your duty to decide what credibility to give to any witness. Therefore, it is your duty to
decide whether this witness is to be believed wholly, partly, or not at all.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
eee990f64d06a3b3167f8e700a94b4f8a72355473e2006292cba06e44fa37598
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.