Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 10.7-1

Criminal Impersonation -- § 53a-130 (a) (1) and (3)

activein force · 2014-11-06 – presentas-observed

The defendant is charged [in count__] with criminal impersonation. The statute defining this

offense reads in pertinent part as follows:

a person is guilty of criminal impersonation when (he/she) <insert appropriate

subsection:>

• § 53a-130 (a) (1): impersonates another and does an act in such assumed character with

the intent to (obtain a benefit / injure another / defraud another).

• § 53a-130 (a) (3): pretends to be a representative of some person or organization and

does an act in such pretended capacity with intent to (obtain a benefit / injure another /

defraud another).

For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements

beyond a reasonable doubt:

Element 1 - Impersonated another

The first element is that the defendant, by (his/her) words or conduct, impersonated <insert as

appropriate:>

• another person.

• a representative of <insert name of person or organization>.

To “impersonate” means to act the part of or to mimic the appearance or manner or adopt the

personal identifying characteristics or information. The person or organization impersonated

must actually exist.

Element 2 - Intent

The second element is that in performing some acts while pretending to be someone else,

(he/she) intended to (obtain a benefit / injure another / defraud another).

<See Intent: Specific, Instruction 2.3-1, and Intent to Defraud, Instruction 2.3-6.>

Conclusion

In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant 1) pretended to

be <insert name of person>, and 2) while pretending to be <insert name of person>, (he/she)

intended to (obtain a benefit / injure another / defraud another).

If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements

of the crime of criminal impersonation, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the other

hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of

the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
dd50192a15378d8507d6a327eeaccb543a3179a7cbd4ac5a6cce560160b9f5a2
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.