CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 10.6-2
Health Insurance Fraud
The defendant is charged [in count__] with health insurance fraud. The statute defining this
offense provides in pertinent part as follows:
a person is guilty of health insurance fraud when (he/she), with the intent to defraud
or deceive any insurer, <insert as appropriate:>
• (presents / causes to be presented) to any (insurer / insurer’s agent) any written or oral
statement as part of or in support of (an application for / claim for payment or other
benefit from) a plan providing health care benefits, whether for (himself/herself), a family
member or a third party, knowing that such statement contains any false, incomplete,
deceptive or misleading information concerning any fact or thing material to such claim
or application, or omits information concerning any fact or thing material to such claim
or application
• (assists / abets / solicits / conspires with) another to prepare or present any written or oral
statement to any insurer or any agent thereof, in connection with, or in support of, an
application for any policy of insurance or claim for payment or other benefit from a plan
providing health care benefits knowing that such statement contains any false, deceptive
or misleading information concerning any fact or thing material to such application or
claim.
“Person” is defined by statute as any individual, corporation, limited liability company,
partnership, association or any other legal entity.1
For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements
beyond a reasonable doubt:
Element 1 - Presented oral or written statement
The first element is that the defendant <insert as appropriate:>
• (presented / caused to be presented)
• (assisted / abetted / solicited / conspired) with another to prepare or present
any written or oral statement as part of or in support of an application for any policy of insurance
or claim for payment or other benefit from a plan providing health care benefits, whether for
himself, a family member or a third party. “Statement” includes but is not limited to any notice,
statement, invoice, account, bill for services, explanation of services, medical opinion, test result,
computer generated document, electronic transmission or other evidence of loss, injury or
expense.2
Element 2 - To an insurer
The second element is that the statement was presented to an insurer or an insurer’s agent.
“Insurer” means any insurance company, health care center, corporation, Lloyd’s insurer,
fraternal benefit society or any other legal entity authorized to provide health care benefits in this
state, including benefits provided under health insurance, disability insurance, workers’
compensation and automobile insurance or any person, partnership, association or legal entity
which is self-insured and provides health care benefits to its employees or governmental entity
which provides medical benefits to Medicare or Medicaid recipients.3
Element 3 - Knowledge
The third element is that the defendant knew that the statement contained false, incomplete,
deceptive or misleading information concerning any fact or thing material to such claim or
application, or knowingly omitted information concerning any fact or thing material to such
claim or application.
“Misleading information” includes but is not limited to falsely representing that goods or
services were medically necessary in accordance with professionally accepted standards.
A person acts “knowingly” with respect to conduct or circumstances when (he/she) is aware that
(his/her) conduct is of such nature or that such circumstances exist. <See Knowledge, Instruction
2.3-3.>
Element 4 - Intent to defraud
The fourth element is that the defendant did so with the specific intent to defraud or deceive the
insurer. <See Intent to Defraud, Instruction 2.3-6.>
Conclusion
In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant 1) (presented /
caused to be presented) an (oral / written) statement in support of (an application for / claim for
payment or other benefit from) a plan providing health care benefits, 2) the statement was
presented to an insurer or an insurer’s agent, 3) the defendant knew that the statement contained
false, incomplete, deceptive or misleading information or omitted information material to the
(application / claim), and 4) the defendant intended to defraud the insurer.
If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements
of the crime of health insurance fraud, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the other
hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of
the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.
1 General Statutes § 53-441 (b).
2 General Statutes § 53-441 (a).
3 General Statutes § 53-441 (c).
4 General Statutes § 53-442.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
3fa7e92deecee8c1e4f436c1b7a5ec41db3e0176cd3ff9a3f62c101fb2662173
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.