Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 10.5-2

Unlawful Sale or Distribution of Certain Software -- § 53-451 (c)

activein force · 2007-12-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant is charged [in count__] with the unlawful sale or distribution of software designed

to facilitate falsification of electronic mail transmission or routing information. The statute

defining this offense reads in pertinent part as follows:

it shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly (sell / give / distribute / possess with

the intent to sell, give or distribute) software that <insert appropriate subsection:>

• § 53-451 (c) (1): is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of facilitating or

enabling the falsification of electronic mail transmission information or other routing

information.

• § 53-451 (c) (2): has only limited commercially significant purpose or use other than to

facilitate or enable the falsification of electronic mail transmission information or other

routing information.

• § 53-451 (c) (3): is marketed by that person or another acting in concert with that person

with that person’s knowledge for use in facilitating or enabling the falsification of

electronic mail transmission information or other routing information.

Element 1 - Sold, distributed, possessed software

The first element is that the defendant (sold / gave / distributed / possessed with the intent to sell,

give, or distribute) software that <insert as appropriate:>

• § 53-451 (c) (1): is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of facilitating or

enabling the falsification of electronic mail transmission information or other routing

information.

• § 53-451 (c) (2): has only limited commercially significant purpose or use other than to

facilitate or enable the falsification of electronic mail transmission information or other

routing information.

• § 53-451 (c) (3): is marketed by that person or another acting in concert with that person

with that person’s knowledge for use in facilitating or enabling the falsification of

electronic mail transmission information or other routing information.

“Computer software” means a set of computer programs, procedures and associated

documentation concerned with computer data or with the operation of a computer, computer

program or computer network.

Element 2 - Knowledge

The second element is that the defendant had knowledge of the character of the software. A

person acts “knowingly” with respect to conduct or circumstances when (he/she) is aware that

(his/her) conduct is of such nature or that such circumstances exist. <See Knowledge, Instruction

2.3-3.>

Conclusion

In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that 1) the defendant (sold / gave /

distributed / possessed with the intent to sell, give, or distribute) software designed to facilitate

falsification of electronic mail transmission or routing information, and 2) the defendant knew

the character of the software.

If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements

of the crime of the unlawful sale or distribution of certain software, then you shall find the

defendant guilty. On the other hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove

beyond a reasonable doubt any of the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
9938e6bc9ea8e74a218146e134db10b2e2e3154d4e057a281f9181864db51288
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.