CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 10.2-8
Payment Card Forgery -- § 53a-128c (f)
The defendant is charged [in count__] with payment card forgery. The statute defining this
offense reads in pertinent part as follows:
any person who, with intent to defraud a purported issuer, a participating party, or a
person providing money, goods, services or anything else of value, or any other
person, (falsely makes a purported payment card / falsely embosses a purported
payment card / falsely loads or causes to be falsely loaded a payment card into a
digital wallet / utters a payment card or purported payment card) is guilty of payment
card forgery.
For you to find the defendant guilty of this charge, the state must prove the following elements
beyond a reasonable doubt:
Element 1 - Falsely made, embossed, uttered, or loaded into a digital wallet, a payment
card
The first element is that the defendant (falsely made a purported payment card / falsely embossed a
purported payment card /falsely loaded or caused to be falsely loaded a payment card into a digital
wallet / uttered a payment card or purported payment card). “Payment card” means either a
credit card or a debit card. “Credit card” means any instrument or device, whether known as a
credit card, as a credit plate, or by any other name, issued with or without fee by an issuer for the
use of a cardholder in obtaining money, goods, services or anything else of value on credit.
“Debit card” means any card, code, device or other means of access, or any combination thereof,
that is issued or authorized for use to debit an asset account held directly or indirectly by a
financial institution and that may be used by the cardholder to obtain money, goods, services or
anything else of value. “Digital wallet” means a software application that is used on a computer
or other device, including, but not limited to, a mobile device, to store digital forms of one or
more payment cards that may be used to obtain money, goods, services or anything else of value.
<Insert as appropriate:>
• A person “falsely makes” a payment card when (he/she) makes or draws, in whole or in
part, a device or instrument that purports to be the payment card of a named issuer but
that is not such a payment card because the issuer did not authorize the making or
drawing, or when such person so alters a payment card that was validly issued.
• A person “falsely embosses” a payment card when, without authorization of the named
issuer, (he/she) completes a payment card by adding any of the matter, other than the
signature of the cardholder, which an issuer requires to appear on the payment card
before it can be used by a cardholder.2
• A person “utters” a payment card when (he/she) offers or tenders or otherwise attempts to
pass such a payment card, or when (he/she) uses or attempts to use such a payment card.
• A person "falsely loads" or "causes to be falsely loaded" a payment card into a digital
wallet when such person stores or causes to be stored on a digital wallet the digital form
of (1) a payment card falsely made or falsely embossed by such person, (2) a payment
card taken, procured, received or retained by such person under circumstances that
constitute payment card forgery or payment card theft, or (3) a payment card that such
person knows is falsely made, falsely embossed, forged, expired or revoked.3
Element 2 - Intent to defraud
The second element is that the defendant intended to defraud a purported issuer, a participating
party, or a person providing money, goods, services, or anything else of value, or any other
person. <See Intent to Defraud, Instruction 2.3-6.>
Conclusion
In summary, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant 1) (falsely made
a purported payment card / falsely embossed a purported payment card / falsely loaded or caused
to be falsely loaded a payment card into a digital wallet / uttered a payment card or purported
payment card), and 2) intended to defraud a purported issuer, a participating party, or a person
providing money, goods, services, or anything else of value, or any other person.
If you unanimously find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each of the elements
of the crime of payment card forgery, then you shall find the defendant guilty. On the other
hand, if you unanimously find that the state has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of
the elements, you shall then find the defendant not guilty.
1 Defined in General Statutes § 53a-128c (f).
2 Id.
3 Id.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
d44572e6822a8ab97cebbae0f49a8f57819f7601c3310600343670a2cedbd332
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.