CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Crim. Jury Instr. 1.2-11
Note-Taking
Note: The trial court has discretion to permit the jurors to take notes, but if it is allowed a
precautionary instruction must be given. Esaw v. Friedman, 217 Conn. 553 (1991).
You may, if you wish, take notes during the course of the trial. <Have the court officer or
marshal distribute note pads and pencils.> You are not required to take notes, even if all of
your fellow jurors do.
Let me emphasize some ground rules for you regarding note-taking. Notes are a sound tool to
help you refresh your recollection during the deliberative phase of this trial; however, notes, by
themselves, are not foolproof. If there is a conflict between your notes and your recollection, it
is your recollection that must prevail.
Additionally, if there is a conflict between your recollection and the notes of a fellow juror, it is
your recollection that should prevail. Your notes are not evidence. You will recall my earlier
definition of what constitutes evidence. Your verdict must be based exclusively on evidence
presented at trial and the principles of law given to you in my final instructions.
The note-taking process should not distract you from focusing on the witness because the
credibility you ascribe to a witness is critical. It is essential that you do not allow note-taking to
interfere with or to impede your ability to view the witness, to listen to him or her, and to size
him or her up; that is to properly evaluate the witness. You should not be so preoccupied with
taking notes that you overlook what the witness is saying and how that witness is saying it. You
may find that note-taking may distract you from giving full attention to a witness. You will need
to observe the demeanor of a witness while he or she is testifying. You will be able to get
testimony played back to you during your deliberations, so you do not need to make your own
record of exactly what was said.
There is no need to try to take a lot of notes or to take down the testimony word for word. You
may not make or modify any notes outside of court. Note pads will be collected at the end of
each trial day and kept secure and confidential by the marshal or court officer. No one will look
at them.
Whatever notes you take are confidential. You are not to exchange or discuss your notes with
your fellow jurors during the trial itself. You may discuss your notes, if you choose, during the
deliberation phase. Just as you cannot discuss or deliberate this case among yourselves until the
case has been completed, so too, you cannot exchange or discuss your notes until the trial has
been completed.
There is no requirement, of course, that you take notes. This is an option to be exercised by each
of you individually. Those of you who elect not to take notes will be no less conscientious than
jurors who take notes.
The juror who takes few or no notes should not permit his or her individual recollection to be
influenced by a juror whose notes may differ from that recollection. Notes are only a tool and
are not always accurate. Do not assume that a voluminous note-taker is taking notes that are
necessarily more accurate.
I take notes because I may be asked to rule on issues during the course of the evidence. Your
decision whether to take notes at any point should not be influenced by my note-taking.
Finally, notwithstanding note-taking by you and your fellow jurors, do not hesitate to seek a
reading of any portion of the testimony if you deem it essential during your deliberations.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
1d62d7516b57e5667d5c52f619c0cc46de5faccc5353fc7cab1fccb5aa844f79
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.