CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Civ. Jury Instr. 6.1
Verdict Form – Simple Apportionment of Negligence (Plaintiff)
CV 06 1234567 SUPERIOR COURT
MARY PLAINTIFF JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF
VS. NEW HAVEN
THOMAS TORTFEASOR AUGUST 9, 2007
VERDICT FOR PLAINTIFF
We, the jury, find the issues in favor of the plaintiff MARY PLAINTIFF and against the
defendant THOMAS TORTFEASOR and award damages as follows:
SECTION ONE: PERCENTAGE OF NEGLIGENCE
Percentage of total negligence attributable to defendant THOMAS TORTFEASOR and to
APPORTIONMENT RESPONDENT, if any:
(If defendant’s portion is 0%, use defendant’s verdict form.)
THOMAS TORTFEASOR 1a. %
APPORTIONMENT RESPONDENT 1b. %
TOTAL 1c. %
SECTION TWO: FINDINGS OF DAMAGES
Economic Damages: 2a. $
Noneconomic Damages: 2b. $
TOTAL 2c. $
SECTION THREE: ALLOCATION AND AWARD OF DAMAGES
Reduction in damages attributable to the negligence of THOMAS TORTFEASOR, if any:
(Multiply line 2c by the percentage on line 1a.)
3. $
The above findings and allocations constitute our award of damages to the plaintiff MARY
PLAINTIFF against the defendant THOMAS TORTFEASOR.
Date Jury Foreperson
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
977dc412f828a9e1d2d19e6059b77d8cc0dd6997db365ae7ed60e3c101898018
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.