Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Civ. Jury Instr. 5.2-3

CUTPA - Unfair Trade Practice - "Cigarette Rule"

activein force · 2008-01-01 – presentas-observed

The plaintiff claims that the defendant's <insert conduct> constituted an unfair trade practice

that violates CUTPA. Certain guidelines have been established as to what constitutes an unfair

trade practice. The plaintiff must establish that the defendant's <insert conduct> meets at least

one of the three following criteria:

1) it offends public policy as it has been established by statutes, the common law or

other established concept of unfairness; or

2) it is immoral, unethical, oppressive or unscrupulous; or

3) it causes substantial injury to consumers, competitors or other business persons.

I will now give additional instructions on these criteria.

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
9934374992fb23e0cfd6406a46a61c7c0320729f25cf78089a207cc60516ba65
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Conn. Civ. Jury Instr. 5.2-3 — CUTPA - Unfair Trade P… · binding.law