Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Civ. Jury Instr. 5.2-1

CUTPA - General

activein force · 2008-01-01 – presentas-observed

The plaintiff claims that the defendant violated the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, a

Connecticut law, commonly known as CUTPA. The plaintiff must prove this claim by a

preponderance of the evidence. The plaintiff must prove that the defendant engaged in an unfair

method of competition or an unfair or deceptive act or practice in the conduct of trade or

commerce and that this caused the plaintiff to sustain an ascertainable loss.

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
20d2918e2cdce3d8a7e3759b0a3e7b99c57cf48351a34f0b43f48f421d114223
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Conn. Civ. Jury Instr. 5.2-1 — CUTPA - General · binding.law