Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Civ. Jury Instr. 4.5-13

Unjust Enrichment (Restitution)

activein force · 2008-01-01 – presentas-observed

In the ______ count, the plaintiff claims the defendant was unjustly enriched. <Refer to verdict

form.> Any damages you award on the plaintiff's unjust enrichment claim are determined by the

value of the benefit the plaintiff provided to the defendant. In other words, the amount of unjust

enrichment is the value to the defendant of <insert property received or services rendered> to

the defendant. The plaintiff must prove the fair and reasonable value of the <insert property

received or services rendered> to the defendant. That value should be measured in terms of the

benefit the defendant received by not providing proper compensation to the plaintiff for <insert

goods/services provided>.

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
4d1a0047ec2e1f90f8c6bef8f46ac27712c6e7036feccd6381fd05bb3b4d96f4
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Conn. Civ. Jury Instr. 4.5-13 — Unjust Enrichment (Re… · binding.law