Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Civ. Jury Instr. 4.2-8

Negotiated Terms Prevail over Standardized Terms

activein force · 2008-01-01 – presentas-observed

The parties have a dispute as to <insert as appropriate:>

• whether the contract provides for <insert terms in dispute>.

• the meaning of the language of the contract that states <insert terms in dispute>.

When you are determining the intent of the parties on this issue, you should favor terms that the

parties specifically negotiated or added to the contract over terms that are part of a standard

form.

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
35406b2154d730745bae6103f70c7f8934fb1073608eee2d711e0d371f30d14f
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.