CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Civ. Jury Instr. 3.7-2
Statutory Negligence - Reckless Driving
We have a statute that provides that no person shall operate any motor vehicle upon any public
highway of the state recklessly, having regard to the width, traffic and use of such highway, the
intersection of streets and the weather conditions. A person operates a motor vehicle recklessly
when that person does so knowing or having reason to know of facts that create a high degree of
risk of physical harm to another and deliberately proceeds to act in conscious disregard of, or
with indifference to, that risk. A person may also operate a motor vehicle recklessly when that
person does so knowing or having reason to know of facts that create a high degree of risk,
although a reasonable person in the same circumstances would realize or appreciate that risk.
In addition to this general definition of reckless driving, the statute further describes two specific
forms of reckless operation of a motor vehicle that constitute reckless driving as a matter of law.
The first is the operation of a motor vehicle upon any public highway at such a rate of speed as to
endanger the life of any person other than the operator of the motor vehicle. The second is the
operation of a motor vehicle upon any public highway at a rate of speed greater than eighty-five
miles per hour.
If you find that the defendant violated the reckless driving statute in any of the ways I have
defined for you, then the defendant was negligent.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
a7e284b26f75076587ceec1f486ad51419370be20485565dc8101df9cd243c9b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.