Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Civ. Jury Instr. 3.5-2

Defendant's Specification of Negligence

activein force · 2008-01-01 – presentas-observed

The special defense filed by the defendant alleges a number of specific ways in which the

plaintiff was negligent. I will read these specific allegations to you shortly. To establish that the

plaintiff was negligent, it is not necessary for the defendant to prove all of these specific

allegations. The proof of any one of these specific allegations is sufficient to prove negligence.

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
c11d669993136d8cc7214e0ac06108f9d0c03dfcda3d4db568f4a7a56505cd79
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Conn. Civ. Jury Instr. 3.5-2 — Defendant's Specificat… · binding.law