Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Civ. Jury Instr. 3.4-9

Damages - Economic without Non-Economic

activein force · 2023-10-02 – presentas-observed

Ladies and gentlemen, I have reviewed your verdict and see that you have found in favor of the

plaintiff and awarded economic damages but have awarded zero non-economic damages. Please

note, however, that if you find that the physical injury that serves as the basis of your award of

economic damages caused the plaintiff to experience any pain or suffering, non-economic

damages are not an optional element of the damage award and you must award non-economic

damages that are fair, just and reasonable as you were previously instructed.

To help eliminate any concerns either party might have, I am going to ask you to go back and

review your verdict. In addition to my instructions regarding the plaintiff’s burden of proving

damages, you should also remember my instruction that even momentary pain and suffering is

compensable.

Now, in sending you back for further deliberations, I am in no way suggesting that you should

change your verdict. I am simply asking you to review your thought processes to determine if

you find that the physical injury that serves as the basis of your award of economic damages

caused the plaintiff to experience any pain or suffering. I am giving you a new verdict form,

which you should use if you decide to change your verdict.

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
c79137c8594a35ff884e037bd1584f749e13616ca1b81b2146ed1565981a716a
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Conn. Civ. Jury Instr. 3.4-9 — Damages - Economic wit… · binding.law