Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Civ. Jury Instr. 3.3-2

Statute of Limitation Defense - Occurrence not Discovery

activein force · 2008-01-01 – presentas-observed

Note: Use if plaintiff asserts lack of knowledge of cause of action, except if fraudulent

concealment is alleged in pleadings, but note that some statutes of limitation, notably, § 52-

584, provide that suit must be brought within a period from the acts on which liability is

based but within a shorter period from discovery.

The time limit for bringing an action applies even if a plaintiff does not discover that (he/she) has

been harmed or does not discover that (he/she) has a claim until the period for bringing a suit has

expired. Under Connecticut law, the time period for bringing suit begins to run from the time of

the act or occurrence, not from the time the party discovers it.

Note: Adapt or omit this paragraph if a tolling doctrine is invoked.

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
b28c834e7eab208bbc3fc6bfc6f0e681722035f1597bc2fefaf7af277f44ff87
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.