CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Civ. Jury Instr. 3.15-4
Tortious Interference - Knowledge
The plaintiff must prove that the defendant knew of the plaintiff's (contract / business
expectancy). The defendant had to be actually aware that the plaintiff's (contract / business
expectancy) existed. The defendant did not have to be aware of the details, merely that the
(contract / business expectancy) existed. The plaintiff cannot recover for an unknowing
interference.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
169bad4e2b91f51630baeae34fe5acb0456cb2f3d51e96b7aa41b5711366a6f7
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.