CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Civ. Jury Instr. 3.11-6
Damages - Retraction under General Statutes § 52-237
We have a statute in Connecticut which imposes some limits on the damages a plaintiff may
recover in a libel case.
This statute gives the defendant the opportunity to publish a retraction of the writing that the
plaintiff claims was libelous. If the defendant properly retracts the libel, the plaintiff's recovery
is limited to those actual damages that (he/she) has specifically alleged and then proven.
You must find that four things happened before you may find that the defendant made a proper
retraction:
1. the plaintiff made a written demand for a retraction;
2. the defendant published the retraction in as public a way as the original,
allegedly libelous writing;
3. the retraction is sufficient to refute the original writing; and
4. the retraction was published within a reasonable time after the demand from
the plaintiff.
If you find that the defendant has proven all four elements of a proper retraction, the plaintiff
may only recover his special damages, which I will explain to you shortly.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
f412416fac6f8a4e5175212e6986a80cb9586f7c1b0b25997ab76302d975e451
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.