Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Civ. Jury Instr. 2.6-2

Burden of Proof - Affirmative Defenses

activein force · 2008-01-01 – presentas-observed

The defendant in this case, (in addition to / instead of) denying the claims made by the plaintiff,

has affirmatively asserted certain special defenses to the plaintiff's claims. I will review these

special defenses with you in a moment. The defendant has the burden of proof as to the

allegations of any special defenses upon which the defendant relies. The plaintiff does not have

the burden to disprove the allegations of the defendant's special defenses. Rather, each party has

the burden of proving that party's own claims and no burden to disprove the claims of that party's

adversary.

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
7bab8601f170cd6467e0c07220c453501e2a8590d75a19a024d2e740917ae30c
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.