Bindinglaw

CT · jury_instructions

Conn. Civ. Jury Instr. 1.2-3

Effect of Side Bars/Argument Without Jury

activein force · 2008-01-01 – presentas-observed

At various times throughout the course of this trial it's been necessary, at the suggestion of the

lawyers or my own judgment, to discuss certain matters outside the hearing of the jury. It is

within my role as a judge to determine which evidence may be presented to you and it is

counsels' job to present those issues to me in a way that will not prejudice the fairness of the

trial. You should not hold it against either counsel if (he/she) suggested that matters be

discussed outside your hearing nor should you speculate as to the matters discussed. The rules of

the court simply require that some issues be resolved outside your hearing.

Provenance

Source
jud.ct.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-23
Edition
2026-08-23
Content hash
e09539d6806fcd81f64434feec5442f190ef80fa5c07801fb1d658b60433aa4a
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.