CT · jury_instructions
Conn. Civ. Jury Instr. 1.1-4
Note-Taking
You may, if you wish, take notes during the course of the trial. <Have the clerk or marshal
distribute note pads and pencils.>
Some jurors find that taking notes is helpful in keeping track of the proceedings and some do not.
You should remember that your main job as jurors is to listen to and observe the witnesses. If
taking notes would distract you from that job, then don't take notes. There is no need to try to
take down the testimony word for word. If, during your deliberations at the end of the case, you
need to hear what a witness said, we have an official tape-recording or court stenographer's
record that will give you an accurate record of all the testimony.
You should not allow note-taking to interfere with your attention to the testimony or your task of
sizing up the witnesses as they testify, but you may take notes if doing so would aid your
memory.
You should not make any notes outside of court and bring them here. Your notebooks will be
collected at the end of each break and kept secure by the clerk. No one will look at them.
I take notes because I may be asked to rule on issues during the course of the evidence. Your
decision whether to take notes at any point should not be influenced by my note-taking.
You should not disclose your notes to anybody during the trial. It will be up to you whether to
disclose them to your fellow jurors during deliberations at the end of the trial.
Provenance
- Source
- jud.ct.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-23
- Edition
- 2026-08-23
- Content hash
de968b5c8fb6766aa51b3e0c33ada86d7527b540416e92f8c58e7631d37c13ae
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.