CO · rules
Colo. RPC 6.1
Voluntary Pro Bono Publico Service
Every lawyer has a professional responsibility to provide legal services to those unable
to pay. A lawyer should aspire to render at least fifty hours of pro bono publico legal
services per year. In fulfilling this responsibility, the lawyer should:
(a) provide a substantial majority of the fifty hours of legal services without fee or
expectation of fee to:
(1) persons of limited means or
(2) charitable, religious, civic, community, governmental and educational organizations in matters that are designed primarily to address the needs of persons of limited
means; and
(b) provide any additional legal or public services through:
(1) delivery of legal services at no fee or a substantially reduced fee to individuals,
groups or organizations seeking to secure or protect civil rights, civil liberties or public
rights, or charitable, religious, civic, community, governmental and educational organizations in matters in furtherance of their organizational purposes, where the payment of
standard legal fees would significantly deplete the organization’s economic resources or
would be otherwise inappropriate;
(2) delivery of legal services at a substantially reduced fee to persons of limited
means; or
(3) participation in activities for improving the law, the legal system or the legal
profession.
In addition, a lawyer should voluntarily contribute financial support to organizations that
provide legal services to persons of limited means.
Where constitutional, statutory or regulatory restrictions prohibit government and public
sector lawyers or judges from performing the pro bono services outlined in paragraphs
(a)(1) and (2), those individuals should fulfill their pro bono publico responsibility by
performing services or participating in activities outlined in paragraph (b).
History
Source: Entire rule repealed and readopted November 2, 1999, effective January 1, 2000; Comment amended and effective November 23, 2005; entire Appendix repealed and readopted April 12, 2007, effective January 1, 2008; Comment amended, effective April 6, 2016. COMMENT [1] Every lawyer, regardless of professional prominence or professional workload, has a re- sponsibility to provide legal services to those unable to pay. Indeed, the oath that Colorado lawyers take upon admittance to the Bar re- quires that a lawyer will never ‘‘reject, from any consideration personal to myself, the cause of the defenseless or oppressed.’’ In some years a lawyer may render greater or fewer hours than the annual standard specified, but during the course of his or her legal career, each lawyer should render on average per year, the number of hours set forth in this Rule. Services can be performed in civil matters or in criminal or quasi-criminal matters for which there is no government obligation to provide funds for le- gal representation, such as post-conviction death penalty appeal cases. [2] Paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) recognize the critical need for legal services that exists among persons of limited means by providing that a substantial majority of the legal services ren- dered annually to the disadvantaged be fur- nished without fee or expectation of fee. Legal services under these paragraphs consist of a full range of activities, including individual and class representation, the provision of legal ad- vice, legislative lobbying, administrative rule making and the provision of free training or mentoring to those who represent persons of limited means. [3] Persons eligible for legal services under paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) are those who qualify for participation in programs funded by the Le- gal Services Corporation and those whose in- comes and financial resources are slightly above the guidelines utilized by such programs but nevertheless, cannot afford counsel. Legal ser- vices can be rendered to individuals or to orga- nizations such as homeless shelters, battered women’s centers and food pantries that serve those of limited means. The term ‘‘governmen- tal organizations’’ includes, but is not limited to, public protection programs and sections of gov- ernmental or public sector agencies. [4] Because service must be provided with- out fee or expectation of fee, the intent of the lawyer to render free legal services is essential for the work performed to fall within the mean- ing of paragraphs (a)(1) and (2). Accordingly, services rendered cannot be considered pro bono under paragraph (a) if an anticipated fee is uncollected, but the award of statutory lawyers’ fees in a case originally accepted as pro bono would not disqualify such services from inclu- sion under this section. Lawyers who do receive fees in such cases are encouraged to contribute an appropriate portion of such fees to organiza- tions or projects that benefit persons of limited means. [5] While it is possible for a lawyer to ful- fill the annual responsibility to perform pro bono services exclusively through activities de- scribed in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2), to the ex- tent that any hours of service remain unfulfilled, the lawyer may satisfy the remaining commit- ment in a variety of ways as set forth in para- graph (b). [6] Paragraph (b)(1) includes the provision of certain types of legal services to those whose incomes and financial resources place them above limited means. It also permits the pro bono lawyer to accept a substantially reduced fee for services. Examples of the types of issues that may be addressed under this paragraph in- clude First Amendment claims, Title VII claims and environmental protection claims. Addition- ally, a wide range of organizations may be rep- resented, including social service, medical re- search, cultural and religious groups. [7] Paragraph (b)(2) covers instances in which lawyers agree to and receive a modest fee for furnishing legal services to persons of limited means. Acceptance of court appoint- ments in which the fee is substantially below a lawyer’s usual rate is encouraged under this section. [8] Paragraph (b)(3) recognizes the value of lawyers engaging in activities that improve the law, the legal system or the legal profession. Serving on bar association committees, serving on boards of pro bono or legal services pro- grams, taking part in Law Day activities, acting as a continuing legal education instructor, a mediator or an arbitrator and engaging in legis- lative lobbying to improve the law, the legal system or the profession are a few examples of the many activities that fall within this para- graph. [8A] Government organizations are encour- aged to adopt pro bono policies at their discre- tion. Individual government attorneys should provide pro bono legal services in accordance with their respective organizations’ internal rules and policies. For further information, see the Colorado Bar Association V oluntary Pro Bono Public Service Policy for Government Attorneys, Suggested Program Guidelines, 29 Colorado Lawyer 79 (July 2000). [9] Because the provision of pro bono ser- vices is a professional responsibility, it is the individual ethical commitment of each lawyer. However, in special circumstances, such as death penalty cases and class action cases, it is appropriate to allow collective satisfaction by a law firm of the pro bono responsibility. There may be times when it is not feasible for a lawyer to engage in pro bono services. At such times a lawyer may discharge the pro bono responsibility by providing financial support to organizations providing free legal services to persons of limited means. Such financial sup- port should be reasonably equivalent to the value of the hours of service that would have otherwise been provided. [10] Because the efforts of individual law- yers are not enough to meet the need for free legal services that exists among persons of lim- ited means, the government and the profession have instituted additional programs to provide those services. Every lawyer should financially support such programs, in addition to either providing direct pro bono services or making financial contributions when pro bono service is not feasible. [11] The responsibility set forth in this Rule is not intended to be enforced through disciplin- ary process. Recommended Model Pro Bono Policy for Colorado Licensed Attorneys and Law Firms Preface. Providing pro bono legal services to persons of limited means and organizations serving persons of limited means is a core value of Colorado licensed attorneys enunciated in Colorado Rule of Professional Conduct 6.1. Adoption of a law firm pro bono policy will commit the firm to this professional value and assure attorneys of the firm that their pro bono work is valued in their advancement within the firm. The Colorado Supreme Court has adopted the following recommended Model Pro Bono Policy that can be modified to meet the needs of individual law firms. References are made to provisions that may not apply in a small firm setting. Adoption of such a policy is entirely voluntary. At the least, a pro bono policy would: (1) clearly set forth an aspirational goal for attorneys, as well as the number of hours for which billable credit will be awarded for firms that operate on a billable hour system (the at- tached model policy uses the figure of at least 50 hours per attorney per year, which mirrors the aspirational goal set out in Rule 6.1); (2) demonstrate that pro bono service will be positively considered in evaluation and com- pensation decisions; and (3) include a description of the processes that will be used to match attorneys with proj- ects and monitor pro bono service, including tracking pro bono hours spent by lawyers and others in the firm. The Colorado Supreme Court will recognize those firms that make a strong commitment to pro bono work by adopting a policy that in- cludes: (1) an annual goal of performing 50 hours of pro bono legal service by each Colorado licensed attorney in the firm, pro-rated for part- time attorneys, primarily for persons of limited means and/or organizations serving persons of limited means consistent with the definition of pro bono services as set forth in this Model Pro Bono Policy; and (2) a statement that the firm will value at least 50 hours of such pro bono service per year by each Colorado licensed attorney in the firm, for all purposes of attorney evaluation, ad- vancement, and compensation in the firm as the firm values compensated client representation. The Colorado Supreme Court will also rec- ognize on an annual basis those Colorado law firms that voluntarily advise the Court by Feb- ruary 15 that their attorneys, on average, during the previous calendar year, performed 50 hours of pro bono legal service, primarily for persons of limited means or organizations serving per- sons of limited means consistent with the defi- nition of pro bono services as set forth in this Model Pro Bono Policy. I. Introduction II. Firm Pro Bono Committee/Coordina- tor III. Pro Bono Services Defined IV. Firm Recognition of Pro Bono Service A. Performance Review and Evaluation B. Credit For Pro Bono Legal Work V. Administration of Pro Bono Service A. Approval of Pro Bono Matters B. Opening a Pro Bono Matter C. Pro Bono Engagement Letter D. Staffing of Pro Bono Matters E. Supervision of Pro Bono Matters F. Professional Liability Insurance G. Paralegal Pro Bono Opportunities H. Disbursements in Pro Bono Matters I. Attorneys Fees in Pro Bono Matters J. Departing Attorneys VI. CLE Credit for Pro Bono Work A. Amount of CLE Credit B. How to Obtain CLE Credit References A. Preamble to the Colorado Rules of Pro- fessional Conduct B. Colorado Rule of Professional Conduct 6.1 C. Chief Justice Directive 98-01, Costs for Indigent Persons Civil Matters D. Colorado Rule of Civil Procedure 260.8 E. Colorado Rule of Civil Procedure 260.8, Form 8 I. Introduction The firm recognizes that the legal community has a unique responsibility to ensure that all citizens have access to a fair and just legal system. In recognizing this responsibility, the firm encourages each of its attorneys to actively participate in some form of pro bono legal rep- resentation. This commitment mirrors the core principles enunciated in the Colorado Rules of Profes- sional Conduct: A lawyer should be mindful of de- ficiencies in the administration of justice and of the fact that the poor, and sometimes persons who are not poor, cannot afford adequate legal as- sistance. Therefore, all lawyers should devote professional time and resources and use civic influence to ensure equal access to our system of justice for all those who because of economic or social barriers cannot afford or secure adequate legal coun- sel. A lawyer should aid the legal profession in pursuing these objec- tives and should help the bar regulate itself in the public interest. . . A lawyer should strive to attain the highest level of skill, to improve the law and the legal profession and to exemplify the legal profession’s ide- als of public service. Preamble, Colorado Rules of Pro- fessional Conduct. The firm understands there are various ways to provide pro bono legal services in our com- munity. In selecting among the various pro bono opportunities, the firm encourages and ex- pects that attorneys (both partners and associ- ates or other designation) will devote a mini- mum of fifty (50) hours each year to pro bono legal services, or a proportional amount of pro bono hours by attorneys on alternative work schedules. In fulfilling this responsibility, firm attorneys should provide a substantial majority of the fifty (50) hours of pro bono legal services to (1) persons of limited means, or (2) chari- table, religious, civic, community, governmen- tal and educational organizations in matters which are designed primarily to address the needs of persons of limited means. Rule 6.1. The firm strongly believes that this level of participation lets our attorneys make a meaning- ful contribution to our legal community, and provides important opportunities to further their professional development. II. Firm Pro Bono Committee/Coordinator (see suggested change for small firms below) The firm has established a Pro Bono Com- mittee responsible for implementing and admin- istering the firm’s pro bono policies and proce- dures. The Pro Bono Committee consists of a representative group of attorneys of the firm. In addition, the firm has designated a Pro Bono Coordinator. The Pro Bono Committee/Pro Bono Coordinator has the following principal responsibilities: 1 encouraging and supporting pro bono le- gal endeavors; 2 reviewing, accepting and/or rejecting pro bono legal projects; 3 coordinating and monitoring pro bono le- gal projects, ensuring, among other things, that appropriate assistance, supervision and re- sources are available; 4 providing periodic reports on the firm’s pro bono activities; and 5 creating and maintaining a pro bono mat- ter tracking system. Attorneys are encouraged to seek out pro bono matters that are of interest to them. **[Small firms may wish to designate only a Pro Bono Coordinator and can introduce the above paragraph as follows: ‘‘The firm has designated a Pro Bono Coordinator respon- sible for implementing and administering the firm’s pro bono policies and procedures’’ and then delete the next two sentences.] The foremost objective of the firm pro bono policy is to provide legal services to persons of limited means and the nonprofit organizations that assist them, in accordance with Rule 6.1. The firm recognizes there are a variety of ways in which the firm’s attorneys and paralegals can provide pro bono legal services in the commu- nity. The following, while not intended to be an exhaustive list, reflects the types of pro bono legal services the firm credits in adopting this policy: A. Representation of Low Income Per- sons. Representation of individuals who cannot afford legal services in civil or criminal matters of importance to a client; B. Civil Rights and Public Rights Law. Representation or advocacy on behalf of indi- viduals or organizations seeking to vindicate rights with broad societal implications (class action suits or suits involving constitutional or civil rights) where it is inappropriate to charge legal fees; and C. Representation of Charitable Organi- zations. Representation or counseling to chari- table, religious, civic, governmental, educa- tional, or similar organizations in matters where the payment of standard legal fees would sig- nificantly diminish the resources of the organi- zation, with an emphasis on service to organi- zations designed primarily to meet the needs of persons of limited income or improve the ad- ministration of justice. D. Community Economic Development. Representation of or counseling to micro-entre- preneurs and businesses for community eco- nomic development purposes, recognizing that business development plays a critical role in low income community development and pro- vides a vehicle to help low income individuals to escape poverty; E. Administration of Justice in the Court System. Judicial assignments, whether as pro bono counsel, or a neutral arbiter, or other such assignment, which attorneys receive from courts on a mandatory basis by virtue of their membership in a trial bar; F. Law-related Education. Legal educa- tion activities designed to assist individuals who are low-income, at risk, or vulnerable to par- ticular legal concerns or designed to prevent social or civil injustice. G. Mentoring of Law Students and Law- yers on Pro Bono Matters. Colorado Supreme Court Rule 260.8 provides that an attorney who acts as a mentor may earn two (2) units of general credit per completed matter in which he/she mentors a law student. An attorney who acts as a mentor may earn one (1) unit of general credit per completed matter in which he/she mentors another lawyer. However, men- tors shall not be members of the same firm or in association with the lawyer providing represen- tation to the client of limited means. Because the following activities, while meri- torious, do not involve direct provision of legal services to the poor, the firm will not count them toward fulfillment of any attorney’s, or the firm’s, goal to provide pro bono legal services to persons of limited means or to nonprofits that serve such persons’ needs: participation in a non-legal capacity in a community or volunteer organization; services to non-profit organiza- tions with sufficient funds to pay for legal ser- vices as part of their normal expenses; client development work; non-legal service on the board of directors of a community or volunteer organization; bar association activities; and non-billable legal work for family members, friends, or members or staff of the firm who are not eligible to be pro bono clients under the above criteria. IV. Firm Recognition of Pro Bono Service (see suggested change for small firms below). A. Performance Review and Evaluation. The firm recognizes that the commitment to pro bono involves a personal expenditure of time. In acknowledgment of this commitment and to support firm goals, an attorney’s efforts to meet this expectation will be considered by the firm in measuring various aspects of the attorney’s performance, such as yearly evaluations and bonuses where applicable. An attorney’s pro bono legal work will be subject to the same criteria of performance review and evaluation as those applied to client-billable work. As with all client work, there should be an emphasis on effective results for the client and the efficient and cost-effective use of firm resources. B. Credit for Pro Bono Legal Work. The firm will give full credit for at least fifty (50) hours of pro bono legal services, and additional hours as approved by the Pro Bono Committee and/or Coordinator, in considering annual bill- able hour goals, bonuses and other evaluative criteria based on billable hours. **[Small firms may wish to only include the following paragraph in lieu of the above provisions: The firm recognizes that the com- mitment to pro bono involves a personal expen- diture of time. In acknowledgment of this com- mitment and to support firm goals, your pro bono service will be considered a positive fac- tor in performance evaluations and compensa- tion decisions and will be subject to the same criteria of performance review and evaluation as those applied to client-billable work. As with all client work, there should be an emphasis on effective results for the client and the efficient and cost-effective use of firm resources.] V. Administration of Pro Bono Service (see suggested change for small firms below). A. Approval of Pro Bono Matters. The Pro Bono Committee/Coordinator will review all proposed pro bono legal matters to ensure that: 1. there is no client or issue conflict or concern; 2. the legal issue raised is not frivolous or untenable; 3. the client does not have adequate funds to retain an attorney; and 4. the matter is otherwise appropriate for pro bono representation. All persons seeking approval of a pro bono project must: (1) submit a request identifying the client and other entity involved; (2) describe the nature of the work to be done; and (3) identify who will be working on the matter. Once the firm undertakes a pro bono matter, the matter is treated in the same manner as the firm’s regular paying work. B. Opening a Pro Bono Matter. It is the responsibility of the attorney seeking to provide pro bono legal services to complete the conflicts check and open a new matter in accordance with regular firm procedures. C. Pro Bono Engagement Letter. After a matter has received initial firm approval, the principal attorney on a pro bono legal matter must send an engagement letter to the pro bono client. Typically, the engagement letter should be sent after the initial client meeting during which the nature and terms of the engagement are discussed. D. Staffing of Pro Bono Matters. Pro bono legal matters are initially staffed on a voluntary basis. It may become necessary to assign additional attorneys to the matter if the initial staffing arrangements prove to be inad- equate, and the firm reserves the right to make such assignments. E. Supervision of Pro Bono Matters. As appropriate, partner shall supervise any associ- ate working on a pro bono legal matter and the supervising partner shall remain informed of the status of the matter to ensure its proper han- dling. In addition, it may be appropriate to use assistance or resources from outside the firm. The firm will assist attorneys in finding a super- visor if necessary. F. Professional Liability Insurance. Attor- neys may provide legal assistance through those pro bono organizations that provide profes- sional liability insurance for their volunteers. The firm also carries professional liability insur- ance for its attorneys in instances where no coverage is available on a pro bono matter through a qualified legal aid organization. Be- fore undertaking any pro bono legal commit- ments, the professional liability implications should be reviewed with the Pro Bono Commit- tee or the Pro Bono Coordinator. G. Paralegal Pro Bono Opportunities. Approved pro bono legal work for paralegals includes: (1) work taken on in conjunction with and under the supervision of an attorney work- ing on a specific pro bono legal matter, or (2) work handled independently for an organization that provides pro bono legal opportunities, pro- vided, however, that such participation does not create an attorney-client relationship and/or in- volve the paralegal’s provision of legal advice. H. Disbursements in Pro Bono Matters. The firm can and should bill and collect dis- bursements in pro bono legal matters where it is appropriate to do so based on the client’s re- sources. The firm encourages attorneys to pur- sue petitions for the waiver of filing fees in civil matters (Chief Justice Directive 98-01) when applicable, and to use pro bono experts, court reporters, investigators and other vendors when available to minimize expenses in pro bono legal matters. The firm may advance or guaran- tee payment of incidental litigation expenses, and may agree that the repayment of such ex- penses may be contingent upon the outcome of the matter in accordance with Rule 1.8(e). The Pro Bono Committee/Pro Bono Coordinator must approve in advance any expense of a non- routine, significant nature, such as expert fees or translation costs. The supervising partner in a pro bono legal matter should participate in de- cisions with respect to disbursements. I. Attorney Fees in Pro Bono Matters. The firm encourages its attorneys to seek and obtain attorney fees in pro bono legal matters where possible. In the event of a recovery of attorney fees, the firm encourages the donation of these fees to an organized non-profit entity whose purpose is or includes the provision of pro bono representation to persons of limited means. J. Departing Attorneys. When an attorney handling a pro bono case leaves the firm, he or she should work with the Pro Bono Committee/ Coordinator to (1) locate another attorney in the firm to take over the representation of the pro bono client, or (2) see if the referring organiza- tion can facilitate another placement. **[Small firms may wish to title this sec- tion ‘‘Pro Bono Procedures’’ and include only the following paragraph in lieu of the above provisions: All pro bono legal matters will be opened in accordance with regular firm procedures, including utilization of a conflicts check and a client engagement letter. Pro bono matters should be supervised by a partner, as appropriate. The firm encourages its attorneys to seek and obtain attorney fees in pro bono legal matters whenever possible.] VI. CLE Credit for Pro Bono Work C.R.C.P. 260.8 provides that attorneys may be awarded up to nine (9) hours of CLE credit per three-year reporting period for: (1) perform- ing uncompensated pro bono legal representa- tion on behalf of clients of limited means in a civil legal matter, or (2) mentoring another law- yer or law student providing such representa- tion. A. Amount of CLE Credit. Attorneys may earn one (1) CLE credit hour for every five (5) billable-equivalent hours of pro bono represen- tation provided to the client of limited means. An attorney who acts as a mentor may earn one (1) unit of general credit per completed matter in which he/she mentors another lawyer. Men- tors shall not be members of the same firm or in association with the lawyer providing represen- tation to the client of limited means. An attor- ney who acts as a mentor may earn two (2) units of general credit per completed matter in which he/she mentors a law student. B. How to Obtain CLE Credit. An attor- ney who seeks CLE credit under C.R.C.P. 260.8 for work on an eligible matter must submit the completed Form 8 to the assigning court, pro- gram or law school. The assigning entity must then report to the Colorado Board of Continu- ing Legal and Judicial Education its recommen- dation as to the number of general CLE credits the reporting pro bono attorney should receive. Recommended Model Pro Bono Policy for Colorado In-House Legal Departments Preface. Providing pro bono legal services to persons of limited means and organizations serving persons of limited means is a core value of Colorado licensed attorneys enunciated in Colorado Rule of Professional Conduct 6.1. Colorado lawyers who work in in-house legal departments have, historically, been an un- tapped source of pro bono volunteers. Rule 6.1 applies equally to in-house lawyers; however, the Court recognizes that the work environment for in-house lawyers is distinct from that of lawyers in private law firms, and may limit the amount of pro bono work lawyers can accom- plish while working in-house. To encourage Colorado in-house lawyers to commit to providing pro bono legal services to persons and organizations of limited means, the Court has adopted rules to overcome some of the barriers impeding in-house counsel from performing pro bono legal work. For example, an in-house attorney who is not licensed to practice in Colorado may obtain a license to perform pro bono legal work, as a pro bono attorney under Rule 204.6. of Chapter 18, the Colorado Court Rules Governing Admission to the Bar. The attorney must pay a one-time fee of $50, and must act under the auspices of a Colorado nonprofit entity whose purpose is or includes the provision of pro bono legal repre- sentation to persons of limited means. The following Model Pro Bono Policy can be modified to meet the needs of individual in- house legal departments. Adoption of such a policy is entirely voluntary. The model policy below is designed to serve as a starting point for in-house legal departments within Colorado that would like to put in place a structured program to encourage their lawyers to engage in pro bono service. The model policy should be adapted as needed to reflect the culture and values of the company or organization and legal department. No formal pro bono policy is needed to launch an in-house pro bono program (indeed, many of the most successful in-house pro bono programs have no policy at all); how- ever, the model below reflects some of the is- sues that an in-house legal department may wish to consider before launching a program. In a few instances below alternative language is suggested. Additional resources and model poli- cies are available from the Pro Bono Institute, Corporate Pro Bono Project: https:// www.probonoinst.org/projects/corporate-pro- bono/. Recommended Model Pro Bono Policy for Colorado In-House Legal Departments I. Introduction II. Mission Statement III. Pro Bono Service Defined IV. Pro Bono Service Participation V. Pro Bono Committee/Coordinator VI. Pro Bono Projects VII. Insurance Coverage VIII. Expenses and Resources IX. Expertise X. Company Affiliation XI. Conflict of Interest References A. Preamble to the Colorado Rules of Pro- fessional Conduct B. Colorado Rule of Professional Conduct 6.1 C. Chief Justice Directive 98-01, Costs for Indigent Persons Civil Matters D. Colorado Rule of Civil Procedure, Chap- ter 18, Rule 204.6 I. Introduction Company recognizes the importance of good corporate citizenship, and supporting the com- munities in which it does business. Performing pro bono services benefits both the profession- als who undertake the work as well as the indi- viduals and organizations served. Pro bono work allows legal professionals to sharpen their existing skills, learn new areas of the law, con- nect more fully with their communities, and achieve a measure of personal fulfillment. Rule 6.1 of the Colorado Rules of Profes- sional Conduct sets forth an aspirational goal that each lawyer render at least 50 hours of pro bono public legal services per year, with a sub- stantial majority of those hours without fee to (1) persons of limited means or (2) governmen- tal or non-profit organization matters designed primarily to address the needs of persons of limited means. [Insert statement about Company’s existing or planned community service work] Company encourages every member of the Legal Department to assist in providing pro bono legal services. Company aspires to attain the goal of each Company attorney devoting a minimum of 50 hours per year to pro bono legal services, or a proportional amount of pro bono hours by attorneys on alternative work sched- ules. II. Mission Statement Through its pro bono program, the Legal Department intends to serve Company’s com- munities by providing pro bono legal services to individuals and organizations that otherwise might not have access to them. In addition, the Legal Department seeks to provide opportuni- ties for rewarding and satisfying work, to spot- light Company’s position as a good corporate citizen, for Legal Department professional skills and career development, and for collaboration and teamwork across Company’s Legal Depart- ment and within the community in general for our attorneys and other professionals. III. Pro Bono Service Defined Pro bono service is the rendering of profes- sional legal services to persons or organizations with limited means, without the expectation of compensation, regardless of whether such ser- vices are performed during regular work hours or at other times. It is this provision of volun- teer legal services that is covered by this pro bono policy. Because the following activities, while meritorious, do not involve direct provi- sion of legal services to the poor, they are not pro bono services under this policy: participa- tion in a non-legal capacity in a community or volunteer organization; services to non-profit organizations with sufficient funds to pay for legal services as part of their normal expenses; non-legal service on the board of directors of a community or volunteer organization; services provided to a political campaign; and legal work for family members, friends, or Company employees who are not eligible to be pro bono clients under an approved pro bono project. IV. Pro Bono Service Participation Every member of Company Legal Depart- ment is encouraged to provide pro bono legal services. The pro bono legal services should not interfere with regular work assignments and must be approved by the Pro Bono Committee/ Coordinator. No attorney will be adversely af- fected by a decision to participate in the pro- gram; conversely, no attorney will be penalized for not participating in the program. Optional language: The Legal Department encourages each member to devote up to 50 hours of regular work time per year toward providing pro bono services. Legal Department members may need to use paid time off for any pro bono services provided in excess of 50 hours per year. [Insert language for process of tracking those hours.] V. Pro Bono Committee/Coordinator To support Company’s efforts to provide pro bono services, Company Legal Department has established a Pro Bono Coordinator/Committee. The Committee/Coordinator oversees the pro bono program, supervises and approves all pro bono matters, ensures that conflicts are identi- fied and processes are followed, and ensures that all pro bono matters are adequately super- vised. The Pro Bono Coordinator/Committee encourages all employees within the Legal De- partment to bring to the Coordinator’s/Commit- tee’s attention any pro bono projects of interest. VI. Pro Bono Projects All pro bono projects must be pre-approved by the Pro Bono Coordinator/Committee. Indi- viduals may not begin their pro bono represen- tations in a particular matter until Coordinator/ Committee approval is received. Individuals must obtain the approval of their supervisors to perform pro bono services during scheduled work hours. The Pro Bono Coordinator/Com- mittee plans to offer, from time to time, group projects that have already been approved. In addition, members of the Legal Department may seek approval for a new project by submit- ting to the Coordinator/Committee a project ap- proval request that contains: the name of the proposed client, the name of the opposing par- ties and other entities (e.g. opposing attorney or law firm) involved, a description of the project including the scope of work to be done, the names of the Law Department members who would work on the project, an estimate of the time required from each person, an estimate of any anticipated costs associated with the proj- ect, anticipated schedule of the project and/or deadlines; supervision or training needs, whether malpractice coverage is provided by the project sponsor, and any other relevant in- formation. VII. Insurance Coverage Company’s insurance carrier provides insur- ance coverage for employees in the Legal De- partment for work performed on approved pro bono projects. Members of the Legal Depart- ment must advise the Pro Bono Coordinator/ Committee immediately should they learn that a complaint or disciplinary complaint may be filed concerning a pro bono matter. OR Company does not have malpractice insur- ance to cover pro bono work of its Legal De- partment members; however, many of the orga- nizations that sponsor pre-approved pro bono projects carry malpractice insurance for their volunteer attorneys. The Pro Bono Coordinator/ Committee will reject any project that does not provide malpractice coverage for the legal ser- vices provided. Members of the Legal Depart- ment must advise the Pro Bono Coordinator/ Committee immediately should they learn that a complaint or disciplinary complaint may be filed concerning a pro bono matter. [Note: The Pro Bono Institute has outlined additional options, such as self-insurance through the purchase of a policy from NLADA, in a paper available here: http://www.cpbo.org/ wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Insurance- Paper .pdf] VIII. Expenses and Resources As with any other Company work assign- ment, individuals doing pro bono work may engage Legal Department legal assistants, para- legals and other support staff in a manner con- sistent with their job responsibilities. Legal De- partment members may use Company facilities, such as telephones, copiers, computers, printers, library materials, research materials, and mail, as appropriate to carry out pro bono work; how- ever, in accordance with the section entitled ‘‘Company Affiliation’’ below, use of Company resources should not convey the impression that Company is providing the pro bono services. Ordinary expenses (e.g., parking, mileage, etc.) may be submitted for reimbursement. Expenses exceeding $250 should be submitted to the Pro Bono Coordinator/Committee for prior ap- proval. Legal Department members should make every effort to control expenses related to pro bono work just as they would for any other legal matter. IX. Expertise Legal Department members providing pro bono services should exercise their best judg- ment regarding their qualifications to handle the issues necessary to provide pro bono services. Those providing pro bono services should ob- tain training on the legal issues they will handle. Training is available through various pro bono organizations, bar associations, law firms, and CLE offerings. X. Company Affiliation Although Company strongly endorses partici- pation in the pro bono program, participants are not acting as Company representatives or em- ployees with respect to the matters they under- take, and Company does not necessarily en- dorse positions taken on behalf of pro bono clients. Therefore, Company Legal Department members participating in such activities do so individually and not as representatives of Com- pany. Individuals who take on pro bono matters must identify themselves to their clients as vol- unteers for the non-profit organization and not as attorneys for Company. Individuals providing pro bono services should not use Company’s stationery for pro bono activities or otherwise engage in any other acts that may convey the impression that Com- pany is providing legal services. Individuals should use the stationery provided by the pro bono referral organization, or if no stationery is provided, blank stationery (i.e. no Company let- terhead). Similarly Company business cards must not be distributed to pro bono clients. Optional Language: Most client interviews or other meetings should take place at the of- fices of a partner organization. If this is not suitable, members of the Legal Department may host pro bono client meetings at a Company location with the prior approval of the Coordi- nator/Committee. The Company attorney host- ing the meeting should take care to remind the pro bono client that, although the meeting is taking place at a Company location, the client is represented by the attorney and not Company. XI. Conflict of Interest Legal Department members may not engage in the provision of any pro bono service which would create a conflict of interest or give the appearance of a conflict of interest. This in- cludes, but is not limited to, direct conflicts, business/public relations conflicts, and politi- cally sensitive issues. Conflicts analysis must be ongoing throughout the course of any represen- tation as an issue raising a conflict may present itself at any time during the course of represen- tation. The Pro Bono Coordinator/Committee will review and resolve any potential conflict issues. ANNOTATION Law reviews. For article, ‘‘Like It or Not, Colorado Already Has ‘Mandatory’ Pro Bono’’, see 29 Colo. Law. 35 (Apr. 2000). For article, ‘‘Repugnant Objectives’’, see 41 Colo. Law. 51 (Dec. 2012). For article, ‘‘Has the Time Come to Revise Our Pro Bono Rules?’’, see 97 Denv. L. Rev. 395 (2020).
Provenance
- Source
- content.leg.colorado.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
0aa27d84bc6372981d22637223281a6972c12b9e0f87cfb64d3785ec909700e9
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.