C.R.J.D. 21.5

(a) Purpose and Scope. Rule 21.5 shall govern discovery in judicial discipline and

disability proceedings. C.R.C.P. 26 shall not apply to such proceedings, except as provided

in this Rule or as ordered by the presiding special master.

(b) Meeting. A meeting of the parties shall be held no later than 14 days after the case

is at issue to confer with each other about the nature and basis of the claims and defenses

and discuss the matters to be disclosed.

(c) Disclosures. No later than 21 days after the case is at issue, the parties shall

disclose:

(1) The name and, if known, the address, and telephone number of each person likely

to have discoverable information relevant to disputed facts alleged in the pleadings, and the

nature of the information;

(2) A listing, together with a copy or description of all documents, written or electronic

records, and tangible things in the possession, custody, or control of the Commission or the

Judge that are relevant to the disputed facts in the proceedings; and

(3) A statement of whether the parties anticipate the use of expert witnesses, identifying the subject areas of the proposed experts.

(d) Limitations. Except upon order by the presiding special master for good cause

shown, discovery shall be limited as follows:

(1) Special counsel may take one deposition of the Judge and two other persons in

addition to the depositions of experts. The Judge or the Judge’s counsel may take one

deposition of the complaining witness and two other persons in addition to the depositions

of experts. The scope and manner of proceeding by way of deposition and the use thereof

shall otherwise be governed by C.R.C.P. 26, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 45.

(2) A party may serve on the adverse party 30 written interrogatories, each of which

shall consist of a single question. The scope and manner of proceeding by means of written

interrogatories and the use thereof shall otherwise be governed by C.R.C.P. Rules 26 and

33.

(3) When the mental or physical condition of the Judge has become an issue in the

proceeding, the presiding special master, on motion of any party or any of the special

masters, may order the Judge to submit to a physical or mental examination by a suitable

licensed or certified examiner. The order may be made only upon a determination that

reasonable cause exists and after notice to the Judge. The Judge will be provided the

opportunity to respond to the motion; and the Judge may request a hearing before the

special masters. The hearing shall be held within 14 days of the date of the Judge’s request,

and shall be limited to the issue of whether reasonable cause exists for such an order.

(4) A party may serve the adverse party requests for production of documents pursuant

to C.R.C.P. 34, except such requests for production shall be limited to 20 in number, each

of which shall consist of a single request.

(5) A party may serve on the adverse party 20 requests for admission, each of which

shall consist of a single request. The scope and manner of proceeding by means of requests

for admission and the use thereof shall otherwise be governed by C.R.C.P. 36.

(e) Good Cause. In determining good cause pursuant to section (d) of this Rule, the

presiding special master shall consider the following:

(1) Whether the scope of the proposed discovery is reasonable and likely to produce

evidence that is material to the issues in the proceedings;

(2) Whether the discovery sought is unreasonably cumulative, unreasonably duplicative, or can be obtained from some other source that is more convenient, less burdensome,

or less expensive;

(3) Whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely

benefit; and

(4) Whether the party seeking discovery has had ample opportunity by disclosure or

discovery in the proceedings to obtain the information sought.

(f) Supplementation of Disclosures and Discovery Responses. A party is under a

duty to supplement its disclosures under section (c) of this Rule when the party learns that

in some material respect the information disclosed is incomplete or incorrect and if the

additional or corrective information has not otherwise been made known to the other

parties during the disclosure or discovery process. A party is under a duty to amend a prior

response to an interrogatory, request for production, or request for admission when the

party learns that the prior response is in some material respect incomplete or incorrect and

if the additional or corrective information has not otherwise been made known to the other

parties during the discovery process. With respect to experts, the duty to supplement or

correct extends to information contained in the expert’s report or summary disclosed in

pre-hearing proceedings and to information provided through any deposition of or interrogatory responses by the expert. Supplementation shall be provided in a timely manner.

(g) Protective Orders. Upon motion by a party or by the person from whom disclosure is due or discovery is sought, accompanied by a certificate that the movant has in good

faith conferred or attempted to confer with other affected parties in an effort to resolve the

dispute, and for good cause shown, the special masters may take any action which justice

requires to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue

burden or expense, including the issuance of one or more of the following orders:

(1) That the disclosure or discovery not be had;

(2) That the disclosure or discovery may be had only on specified terms and conditions, including designation of the time or place;

(3) That the discovery may be had only by a method of discovery other than that

selected by the party seeking discovery;

(4) That certain matters not be inquired into, or that the scope of the disclosure or

discovery be limited to certain matters;

(5) That discovery be conducted with no one present except persons designated by the

special masters; and

(6) That a deposition, if sealed, be opened only by order of the special masters.

If the motion for a protective order is denied in whole or in part, the special masters, on

such terms and conditions as are just, may order that any party or other person provide or

permit discovery. The provisions of C.R.C.P. 37(a)(4) apply to an award of expenses

incurred with regard to the motion.