CO · rules
Crim. P. 6.8
Indictment — Amendment
(a) Matters of Form, Time, Place, Names. At any time before or during trial, the court
may, upon application of the people and with notice to the defendant and opportunity for
the defendant to be heard, order the amendment of an indictment with respect to defects,
errors, or variances from the proof relating to matters of form, time, place, and names of
persons when such amendment does not change the substance of the charge, and does not
prejudice the defendant on the merits. Upon ordering an amendment, the court, for good
cause, may grant a continuance to accord the defendant adequate opportunity to prepare his
defense.
(b) Prohibition as to Substance. No indictment may be amended as to the substance
of the offense charged.
History
ANNOTATION The policy underlying this rule is to insure that an indictment reflects the will of the grand jury. People v. Campbell, 194 Colo. 451, 573 P.2d 557 (1978). It was not essential for all members of a grand jury who issued a true bill to specifi- cally observe the formal charging paper and approve its formal language. People v. Camp- bell, 194 Colo. 451, 573 P.2d 557 (1978). Trial court did not violate this rule by allowing the indictment to be amended to add a charge where the defendant entered into an agreement to plead nolo contendere to the added charge in exchange for a dis- missal of all other charges in the indictment. People v. V aldez, 928 P.2d 1387 (Colo. App. 1996). Trial court’s addition of habitual criminal counts had no effect on the substance of the indictment or the second degree assault charge and did not violate the provision of this rule prohibiting such amendments under this rule. People v. Martinez, 18 P.3d 831 (Colo. App. 2000). An indictment may be amended to fix de- fects, errors, or variances of proof, if the change is not substantial or an element of the crime. The indictment was amended to change dates and the dates were not a material element of any of the offenses, therefore, the defendant was not prejudiced. People v. James, 40 P.3d 36 (Colo. App. 2001). Applied in People v. Thimmes, 643 P.2d 780 (Colo. App. 1981).
Provenance
- Source
- content.leg.colorado.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
f8ae0327bc25dbf40278dfdc7091f0158647aad56dcf32ed496eb7cd6c757241
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.