Bindinglaw

CO · rules

Crim. P. 51

Exceptions Unnecessary

activein force · 2023-12-01 – presentact-effective-date

Exceptions to ruling or orders of the court are unnecessary. For all purposes for which an

exception has heretofore been necessary it is sufficient that a party, at the time the court

ruling or order is made or sought, makes known to the court the action which he desires the

court to take or his objection to the court’s action and the grounds therefor. But if a party

has no opportunity to object to a ruling or order, the absence of an objection does not

thereafter prejudice him.

History

ANNOTATION Allegation of prejudice gives standing for review, regardless of lack of objection. A de- fendant’s claim that the trial court’s ruling ad- versely affected the exercise of his right to tes- tify in his own defense alleges sufficient prejudice to give him standing to seek review of that ruling, whether or not he objected when the ruling was made. People v. Evans, 630 P.2d 94 (Colo. App. 1981). Court must allow contemporaneous objec- tions to evidence and the court’s rulings. Without a contemporaneous record of the grounds that a party stated at the time of a objection, disputes as to the grounds asserted for error may arise. Jones v. District Court, 780 P.2d 526 (Colo. 1989). Applied in People v. Peterson, 656 P.2d 1301 (Colo. 1983).

Provenance

Source
content.leg.colorado.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-15
Content hash
2f88711329f2dd99ba7bb9a776daf116d870d1e74ba682f717abd133c2a60ea8
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Crim. P. 51 — Exceptions Unnecessary · binding.law