Bindinglaw

CO · rules

CRE 1101

Applicability of Rules

activein force · 2023-12-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Courts. These rules apply to all courts in the State of Colorado.

(b) Proceedings generally. These rules apply generally to civil actions, to criminal

proceedings, and to contempt proceedings, except those in which the court may act

summarily.

(c) Rule of privilege. The rule with respect to privileges applies at all stages of all

actions, cases, and proceedings.

(d) Rules inapplicable. The rules (other than with respect to privileges) do not apply

in the following situations:

(1) Preliminary questions of fact. The determination of questions of fact preliminary to

admissibility of evidence when the issue is to be determined by the court under Rule 104.

(2) Grand jury. Proceedings before grand juries.

(3) Miscellaneous proceedings. Proceedings for extradition or rendition; preliminary

examinations in criminal cases; sentencing, or granting or revoking probation; issuance of

warrants for arrest, criminal summonses, and search warrants; and proceedings with

respect to release on bail or otherwise.

(e) Rules applicable in part. In any special statutory proceedings, these rules apply to

the extent that matters of evidence are not provided for in the statutes which govern

procedure therein.

History

(Federal Rule Identical.) (Federal Rule Identical.) Editor’s note: The Colorado Rules of Evidence do not apply to hearings under the Colorado Rules for Traffic Infractions. See Rule 11(c), C.R.T.I. COMMITTEE COMMENT The Colorado rule is culled from Rule 81 of the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 1101(e) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. ANNOTATION Grand jury or preliminary hearing. Hear- say, and other evidence which would be incom- petent if offered at trial, is admissible and may well be the bulk of evidence offered to the grand jury or at the preliminary hearing. People v. Gable, 647 P.2d 246 (Colo. App. 1982); People v. Buhrle, 744 P.2d 747 (Colo. 1987). The rules of evidence do not apply to a restitution hearing because restitution is part of the sentencing proceeding, not part of the trial. People v. V asseur, 2016 COA 107, 409 P.3d 516. Applied in Sherman v. District Court, 637 P.2d 378 (Colo. 1981); People v. Bowers, 801 P.2d 511 (Colo. 1990).

Provenance

Source
content.leg.colorado.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-15
Content hash
58c34e4fd1c227020aae8328110f269f8e3033de4028755b0d6e447e17ac581e
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
CRE 1101 — Applicability of Rules · binding.law