Bindinglaw

CO · rules

C.R.C.P. 46

Exceptions Unnecessary

activein force · 2023-12-01 – presentact-effective-date

Formal exceptions to rulings or orders of the court are unnecessary; but for all purposes

for which an exception has heretofore been necessary it is sufficient that a party, at the time

the ruling or order of the court is made or sought, makes known to the court the action

which he desires the court to take or his objection to the action of the court and his grounds

therefor; and, if a party has no opportunity to object to a ruling or order at the time it is

made, the absence of an objection does not thereafter prejudice him.

History

ANNOTATION Law reviews. For article, ‘‘Colorado Crimi- nal Procedure — Does It Meet Minimum Stan- dards?’’, see 28 Dicta 14 (1951). For article, ‘‘Trials: Rules 38-53’’, see 23 Rocky Mt. L. Rev. 571 (1951). For article, ‘‘One Y ear Review of Civil Procedure’’, see 34 Dicta 69 (1957). For article, ‘‘There is Still a Chance: Raising Unpreserved Arguments on Appeal’’, see 42 Colo. Law. 29 (June 2013). This rule is mandatory. Anderson v. Ander- son, 124 Colo. 74, 234 P.2d 903 (1951). An appellate court may refuse to consider a specification where this rule has not been complied with. Anderson v. Anderson, 124 Colo. 74, 234 P.2d 903 (1951); Allen v. Crouch, 134 Colo. 603, 307 P.2d 815 (1957). Where a party is afforded no opportunity by the court to register an objection, the ab- sence of an objection in the record does not prejudice the party upon review. Brakhahn v. Hildebrand, 134 Colo. 197, 301 P.2d 347 (1956). A party who was afforded no opportunity to object to an instruction given orally out- side his presence is not precluded from raising the point on review. Reimer v. Walker, 170 Colo. 149, 459 P.2d 274 (1969). Failure of prosecution to object to trial court’s action, which objection affords trial court opportunity to correct an alleged error, precludes review of merits on appeal. People v. Schweer, 775 P.2d 582 (Colo. 1989). Applied in Menne v. Menne, 194 Colo. 304, 572 P.2d 472 (1977).

Provenance

Source
content.leg.colorado.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-15
Content hash
a836baf6de96b76dc21b3a7b585f0859c6f7a670d807c2dd50e19c3bd5e086da
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.