C.R.C.P. 29

History

Source: Entire rule amended and adopted April 14, 1994, effective January 1, 1995, for all cases filed on or after that date. Cross references: For stipulations extending time in interrogatories for responses to discovery, see C.R.C.P. 33; for stipulations extending time in the production of documents and things and entry upon land for inspection and other purposes for responses to discovery, see C.R.C.P. 34; for stipulations extending time in admissions for responses to discovery, see C.R.C.P. 36. ANNOTATION Law reviews. For article, ‘‘Depositions and Discovery, Rules 26 to 37’’, see 28 Dicta 375 (1951). For article, ‘‘Depositions and Discov- ery: Rules 26-37’’, see 23 Rocky Mt. L. Rev. 562 (1951). For article, ‘‘Plaintiff’s Advanta- geous Use of Discovery, Pre-Trial and Sum- mary Judgment’’, see 40 Den. L. Ctr. J. 192 (1963). For article, ‘‘A Deposition Primer, Part I: Setting Up the Deposition’’, see 11 Colo. Law. 938 (1982). For article, ‘‘A Deposition Primer, Part II: At the Deposition’’, see 11 Colo. Law. 1215 (1982). For article, ‘‘Taking Evi- dence Abroad for Use in Litigation in Colo- rado’’, see 14 Colo. Law. 523 (1985). C.R.C.P. 26 to 37 must be construed to- gether along with the requirement that plaintiff establish a prima facie case for punitive dam- ages, as a condition precedent to the plaintiff’s right to discovery of defendant’s financial infor- mation. Leidholt v. District Court, 619 P.2d 768 (Colo. 1980). Applied in Ricci v. Davis, 627 P.2d 1111 (Colo. 1981).