CO · rules

C.R.C.P. 265

Professional Service Companies

activein force · 2009-02-26 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Rendering Legal Service Through a Professional Company. One or more

attorneys who are licensed to practice law in Colorado may render legal services in

Colorado through a professional company, as that term is defined in Section (e), provided

that such professional company is established and operated in accordance with the provisions of this Rule and the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct.

(1) Professional Company Name. The name of the professional company shall

comply with the provisions of the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct regarding the

names of law firms.

(2) Owners’ Liability for Professional Acts, Errors, or Omissions. Each of the

owners of the professional company shall be deemed to agree, by reason of the rendering

of legal services by any attorney through the professional company, that each of them who

is an owner at the time of the commission of any act, error, or omission in the rendering of

legal services by any owner or other person for whose acts, errors, or omissions the

professional company is liable, assumes, jointly and severally to the extent provided by

this Rule the liability of the professional company for such act, error, or omission.

Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, any owner who has not directly participated in the

act, error, or omission in the rendering of legal services for which liability is incurred by

the professional company does not assume such liability, except as provided in subsection

(a)(3)(D), if, at the time the act, error, or omission occurs the professional company has

professional liability insurance that meets the minimum requirements stated in subsection

(a)(3).

(3) Professional Liability Insurance Policy Requirements. The professional liability

insurance contemplated in subsection (a)(2) shall meet the following minimum requirements:

(A) Professional Acts Coverage. The professional liability insurance shall insure the

professional company against liability imposed upon it arising out of the rendering of legal

services by any attorney through the professional company and against the liability

imposed upon it arising out of the acts, errors, and omissions of all nonattorney employees

assisting in the rendering of legal services by any attorney through the professional

company.

(B) Policy Language. The policy or policies for the professional liability insurance

may contain reasonable provisions with respect to policy periods, territory, claims, conditions, and other matters.

each claim of at least the lesser of $100,000 multiplied by the number of attorneys who

render legal services through the professional company or $500,000. If the policy or

policies for the professional liability insurance provide for an aggregate top limit of

liability per year for all claims, the top limit shall not be less than the lesser $300,000

multiplied by the number of attorneys who render legal services through the professional

company or $2,000,000.

(D) Deductibles and Defense Costs. The policy or policies for the professional

liability insurance may provide for a deductible or self-insured retained amount and may

provide for the payment of defense or other costs out of the stated limits of the policy. The

liability assumed by each owner of the professional company who has not directly

participated in the act, error or omission in the rendering of legal services for which

liability is incurred by the professional company shall be the lesser of the actual liability of

the professional company in excess of insurance available to pay such damages or the sum

of the following:

(I) such deductible or retained self-insurance; and

(II) the amounts, if any, by which the payment of defense costs has reduced the

insurance remaining available for the payment of damages incurred by reason of the

liability of the professional company below the minimum limit of insurance required by

subsection (a)(3)(C).

(E) Determination of Coverage. An act, error, or omission in the rendering of legal

services shall be deemed to be covered by professional liability insurance for the purpose

of this Rule if the policy or policies include such act, error, or omission as a covered

activity, regardless of whether claims previously made against the policy have exhausted

the aggregate top limit for the applicable time period or whether the individual claimed

amount or ultimate liability exceeds either the per claim or aggregate top limit.

(F) Limitation of Vicarious Liability. The liability assumed by the owners of a

professional company under this Rule is limited to the liability of the professional

company for acts, errors, or omissions incurred in the rendering of legal services by any

owner or other person for whose acts, errors, or omissions the professional company is

liable and shall not extend to any other liability incurred by the professional company.

Liability, if any, for any and all acts, errors, and omissions, other than acts, errors, or

omissions incurred in the rendering of legal services by any owner or other person for

whose acts, errors, or omissions the professional company is liable, shall be as otherwise

provided by law and shall not be changed, affected, limited, or extended by this Rule.

(b) Compliance with Rules of Professional Conduct. Nothing in this Rule shall be

deemed to diminish or change the obligation of each attorney rendering legal services

through a professional company to comply with the Colorado Rules of Professional

Conduct promulgated by this Court.

comply with any of the provisions of this Rule by the professional company may be

grounds for this Court to terminate or suspend the right of any attorney who is an owner of

such professional company to render legal services in Colorado through a professional

company.

(d) Professional Company Constituencies. A professional company may have one or

more owners that are professional companies, so long as each such owner that is a

professional company and the professional company of which they are owners are both

established and operated in accordance with the provisions of this Rule.

(e) ‘‘Professional Company’’ Defined. For purposes of this Rule, a professional

company is a corporation, limited liability company, limited liability partnership, limited

partnership association, or other entity that may be formed under Colorado law to transact

business or any entity that can be formed under the law of any other jurisdiction and

through which attorneys may render legal services in that jurisdiction, except that the term

excludes a general partnership that is not a limited liability partnership and excludes every

other entity the owners of which are subject to personal liability for the obligations of the

entity.

History

Source: Entire chapter repealed and adopted November 22, 1995, effective December 1, 1995; entire rule amended and effective February 26, 2009. Cross references: For corporations and associations, see title 7, C.R.S. ANNOTATION Law reviews. For article, ‘‘Law Firm Incor- poration in Colorado’’, see 34 Rocky Mt. L. Rev. 427 (1962). For comment on Empey v. United States appearing below, see 46 Den. L.J. 306 (1969). For article, ‘‘Changes in the Rule Authorizing Professional Corporations’’, see 25 Colo. Law. 67 (Mar. 1996). For article, ‘‘The Function of CRCP 265: Rendering Legal Ser- vices through a Professional Company’’, see 47 Colo. Law. 25 (May 2018). This rule authorizes lawyers to organize professional service corporations under the Colorado corporation code and thereafter oper- ate them for the practice of law, provided they organize and operate such corporations in ac- cordance with the provisions of this rule. United States v. Empey, 406 F.2d 157 (10th Cir. 1969). Such lawyers are entitled to be treated as a corporation for income tax purposes. A cor- poration organized to practice a learned profes- sion under the general corporation laws of a state which has to meet requirements laid down in this rule is entitled to be treated as a corpo- ration for federal income tax purposes. United States v. Empey, 406 F.2d 157 (10th Cir. 1969). The definition of a partnership plainly re- fers to unincorporated organizations; so, to treat as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, a corporation, organized and char- tered under state laws as a corporation and operated as such in good faith, does violence to the statutory definitions of the terms ‘‘partner- ship’’ and ‘‘corporation’’ of the internal revenue statutes. United States v. Empey, 406 F.2d 157 (10th Cir. 1969). Activities of law firm incorporated as pro- fessional corporation in conducting a busi- ness of selling television advertising materi- als go beyond the purpose of conducting a law practice and violate this rule, and, there- fore, contracts made by such professional cor- poration are unenforceable. Network Affiliates, Inc. v. Robert E. Schack, P .A., 682 P.2d 1244 (Colo. App. 1984). Failure of attorney to register as a profes- sional corporation for the practice of law vio- lated DR 1-102 and subjected attorney to disci- plinary proceedings. People v. Dickinson, 903 P.2d 1132 (Colo. 1995). Requirements contained in this rule are applicable only for the acts, errors, and omis- sions of the employees of the corporation. Gutrich v. LaPlante, 942 P.2d 1266 (Colo. App. 1996), aff’d on other grounds sub nom. Gutrich v. Cogswell & Wehrle, 961 P.2d 1115 (Colo. 1998).

Provenance

Source: content.leg.colorado.gov
Retrieved: 2026-09-15
Edition: 2026-09-15
Content hash: b016a5bc91c45b2e1d30a636d707b9ddddf3a47f11b56be3a8fd77f4a82dd7b2

View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs