CO · rules
C.R.C.P. 242.6
Presiding Disciplinary Judge
(a) Presiding Disciplinary Judge. The supreme court appoints one or more Presiding
Disciplinary Judges to serve at the pleasure of the supreme court.
(b) Qualifications. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge must be a lawyer admitted to
practice law in Colorado with at least five years of experience in the practice of law. The
Presiding Disciplinary Judge must not hold other public office while serving as Presiding
Disciplinary Judge.
(c) Powers and Duties of the Presiding Disciplinary Judge. The Presiding Disciplinary
Judge, under a budget approved by the supreme court, is authorized and empowered to act
in accordance with this rule, including by:
(1) Maintaining and supervising a permanent, central office;
(2) Hiring and supervising a staff to carry out the duties of the Presiding Disciplinary Judge;
(3) Presiding over disciplinary and other proceedings as provided in Chapters 18-20,
including by ruling on legal and other issues consistent with the general authority conferred upon courts under the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure, administering oaths and
affirmations in proceedings, imposing disciplinary sanctions on lawyers as provided in this
rule, and reinstating or readmitting lawyers to the practice of law;
(4) Adopting practices needed to govern the internal operation of the Office of the
Presiding Disciplinary Judge;
(5) Periodically reporting to the Advisory Committee on the operation of the Office of
the Presiding Disciplinary Judge;
(6) Recommending to the Advisory Committee any proposed changes to the Rules
Governing the Practice of Law;
(7) Recommending to the Advisory Committee appointments to the pool of Hearing
Board members;
(8) Where issuance of a subpoena for use in another jurisdiction’s disciplinary or
disability proceeding has been approved in that jurisdiction, issuing a subpoena governed
by C.R.C.P. 45 to compel the attendance of a witness or the production of documents in the
Colorado county where the witness resides, or is employed, or elsewhere as agreed by the
witness; and
(9) Performing such other duties as the supreme court may direct.
(d) Disqualification. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge must refrain from taking part in
a proceeding in which a similarly situated judge would be required to disqualify. No
lawyer currently affiliated by employment with the Presiding Disciplinary Judge may
represent anyone in a proceeding under the Rules Governing the Practice of Law so long
as the Presiding Disciplinary Judge is serving in that role. If the Presiding Disciplinary
Judge has been disqualified, the clerk of the Presiding Disciplinary Judge will select a
presiding officer from among the available Colorado lawyers in the Hearing Board pool.
The presiding officer must act in accordance with this rule. When a presiding officer is
selected to serve in a proceeding under this rule, the presiding officer is empowered in that
proceeding to take all actions normally entrusted to the Presiding Disciplinary Judge.
(e) Former Presiding Disciplinary Judges. A former presiding disciplinary judge or a
former member of that judge’s staff is subject to Colo. RPC 1.12. For purposes of this
subsection, a ‘‘matter’’ includes substantially related proceedings.
History
Source: Entire rule added and adopted May 20, 2021, effective for cases filed with the Presiding Disciplinary Judge or the Supreme Court on or after July 1, 2021, and, as to all other matters covered by these rules, effective July 1, 2021.
Provenance
- Source
- content.leg.colorado.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
35ab70d0cff3c9c973294be412faab7d08bf63c356d57cdcee5ab40199999491
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.