Bindinglaw

CO · rules

C.R.C.P. 242.43

Expungement of Records

activein force · 2021-07-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Records Subject to Expungement. Except for records of proceedings that have

become public under C.R.C.P. 242.41, all records of proceedings that were dismissed must

be expunged from the files of the Regulation Committee and the Regulation Counsel five

years after the end of the calendar year in which the dismissal occurred. When a

respondent successfully completes a diversion agreement in a disciplinary proceeding that

did not result in the filing of a complaint, all files and records from that proceeding must

be expunged five years after the end of the calendar year in which the diversion was

completed. But if a new request for investigation is filed against the respondent before an

existing diversion file is expunged, the Regulation Counsel may wait to expunge the file

until the new proceeding has been resolved. Files and records that notify the Regulation

Counsel of a lawyer’s conviction of a crime need not be expunged.

(b) Effect of Expungement. The Regulation Committee and the Regulation Counsel

must respond to any general or specific inquiry concerning the existence of a proceeding

the records of which have been expunged by stating that no record of a proceeding exists.

(c) Extension of Time to Retain Records. The Regulation Counsel may apply in

writing to the Regulation Committee for permission to retain files and records that would

otherwise be expunged under this section 242.43 for an additional period of time not to

exceed three years. After giving the lawyer in question notice and an opportunity to

respond in writing, the Regulation Committee may grant the request on a finding of good

cause. Through the same procedure, the Regulation Committee may grant additional

extensions.

History

Source: Entire rule and comment added and adopted May 20, 2021, effective for cases filed with the Presiding Disciplinary Judge or the Supreme Court on or after July 1, 2021, and, as to all other matters covered by these rules, effective July 1, 2021. COMMENT C.R.C.P. 242.43(b) governs only how the Regulation Committee and the Regulation Counsel should respond to an inquiry concern- ing the existence of proceedings the records of which have been expunged. That subsection does not address how lawyers should respond to such an inquiry. Other legal authorities or re- quirements may govern how a lawyer should respond depending on the context in which the inquiry arises. RULE 243. Rules Governing Lawyer Disability Proceedings

Provenance

Source
content.leg.colorado.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-15
Content hash
5428be03f439cd8f22bebc187d299d276c651f8dfc1fe8fea136468fa511dd91
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
C.R.C.P. 242.43 — Expungement of Records · binding.law