CO · rules
C.R.C.P. 242.18
Probation
(a) Overview. Probation is a form of discipline that allows a respondent who has been
found to have committed misconduct to continue practicing law subject to supervision
when the respondent would benefit from conditions designed to improve the respondent’s
skills or ethical infrastructure or to manage a behavioral health issue, including a mental
health or substance use issue. An order of probation must specify the conditions of
probation. Probation must be imposed for a specified period of time in conjunction with a
suspension, which may be stayed in whole or in part. A period of probation must not
exceed three years, unless the Presiding Disciplinary Judge grants an extension on motion
by either party.
(b) Eligibility. Probation may be imposed only when a respondent:
(1) Is unlikely to harm the public during the period of probation and can be adequately
supervised;
(2) Is able to practice law without undermining public confidence in the legal system;
and
(3) Has not committed misconduct for which the presumptive form of discipline is
disbarment.
(c) Conditions. Conditions must take into consideration the nature and circumstances
of the respondent’s misconduct and the respondent’s history and health status. A mandatory condition of probation is that the respondent must not commit further violations of the
Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct during the period of probation. Other conditions
may include one or more of the following:
(1) Periodic reporting to the Regulation Counsel;
(2) Monitoring of the respondent’s law practice or accounting procedures;
(3) Establishing a relationship with a lawyer-mentor;
(4) Satisfactory completion of a course of study;
(5) Achieving a passing score on the multistate professional responsibility examination;
(6) Payment of restitution;
(7) Evaluation or treatment of medical or behavioral health issues, including mental
health or substance use issues;
(8) Evaluation or treatment in a program for disorders related to sexual misconduct;
(9) Evaluation or treatment in a program for addressing matters relating to family
violence, including domestic partner, elder, and child abuse;
(10) Compliance with civil or criminal court orders;
(11) Abstinence from or limitations on the use of alcohol or drugs; and
(12) Payment of expenses associated with probationary conditions.
(d) Monitoring. The Regulation Counsel must monitor the respondent’s compliance
with the conditions of probation.
(e) Termination. Probation does not terminate until the Presiding Disciplinary Judge
enters an order of termination. To seek timely termination of probation, a respondent must
file with the Presiding Disciplinary Judge, no earlier than 28 days before the date probation
is scheduled to terminate, an affidavit attesting to whether the respondent has complied
with each term of probation. Within 14 days of that filing, unless otherwise ordered, the
Regulation Counsel must file either a notice that the Regulation Counsel does not object to
the termination of probation or a motion to revoke probation. On receiving notice that the
Regulation Counsel does not object to termination of probation, the Presiding Disciplinary
Judge will enter an order terminating probation. An order of termination takes effect no
earlier than the date probation is scheduled to terminate.
(f) Violations.
(1) Initiation of Revocation Proceeding. If, while a respondent is on probation, the
Regulation Counsel receives information that the respondent may have violated a condition
of probation, the Regulation Counsel may move that the Presiding Disciplinary Judge
order the respondent to show cause why the stay on the respondent[92]s suspension
should not be lifted.
(2) Continued Compliance. During a revocation proceeding, the respondent must
continue to comply with the probationary conditions unless otherwise ordered.
(3) Hearing. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge may hold a revocation hearing on
motion of either party or on the Presiding Disciplinary Judge’s own initiative. The clerk of
the Presiding Disciplinary Judge may issue subpoenas under C.R.C.P. 45. At the hearing,
the Regulation Counsel has the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence
that the respondent violated a condition of probation and to justify the relief requested. The
Presiding Disciplinary Judge may receive any evidence with probative value regardless of
its admissibility under the rules of evidence if the respondent has a fair opportunity to rebut
hearsay evidence. When the alleged violation is the respondent[92]s failure to pay
restitution or costs, evidence of the failure to pay constitutes prima facie evidence of a
violation.
(4) Order. After a hearing or after briefing if no hearing is held, the Presiding
Disciplinary Judge will enter an order revoking probation, modifying the conditions or
length of probation, or directing that probation remain in effect.
(5) Costs. If probation is revoked or modified, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge may
assess against the respondent all or any part of the reasonable costs of the revocation
proceeding.
(g) Independent Charges. The filing or the granting of a motion under subsection (f)
above does not preclude the Regulation Counsel from filing independent disciplinary
charges based on the same underlying conduct.
History
Source: Entire rule added and adopted May 20, 2021, effective for cases filed with the Presiding Disciplinary Judge or the Supreme Court on or after July 1, 2021, and, as to all other matters covered by these rules, effective July 1, 2021. ANNOTATION Annotator’s note. The following annotations include cases decided under former provisions similar to this rule. The expiration of a specific period of pro- bation imposed on an attorney does not alone entitle that attorney to reinstatement to the unconditional practice of law. While the rule does not expressly state that the probationer remains on probation until an order of success- ful completion has issued, that is not only a probable, but in fact the necessary, implication of the requirement. In re Bass, 2013 CO 40, 307 P.3d 1052. Applied in In re Green, 982 P.2d 838 (Colo. 1999).
Provenance
- Source
- content.leg.colorado.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
a5a8a20062b6b1426f3811f9ee2e657930d99bcde0973dfcf56c3ca1d4b1d619
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.