CO · rules
C.R.C.P. 242.13
Request for Investigation
(a) Requesting an Investigation. Requests for investigation, which cannot be made
anonymously, may be made:
(1) By any person and directed to the Regulation Counsel;
(2) By a judge of any court of record and directed to the Regulation Counsel;
(3) By the Regulation Committee on its own motion and directed to the Regulation
Counsel; or
(4) By the Regulation Counsel with the concurrence of the Chair or Vice-Chair of the
Regulation Committee.
(b) Preliminary Investigation.
(1) On receiving a request for investigation under subsection (a) above, the Regulation
Counsel must conduct a preliminary investigation to decide:
(A) Whether the lawyer is subject to C.R.C.P. 242.1(a) and whether an allegation has
been made that, if proved, would constitute grounds for discipline; and if so,
(B) Whether to formally investigate the matter under C.R.C.P. 242.14 or to address the
matter by means of a diversion program under C.R.C.P. 242.17.
(2) If requested to do so, the lawyer must submit to the Regulation Counsel a written
response to the allegations within 21 days. The Regulation Counsel may require the lawyer
to provide a copy of the written response to the complaining witness, except when a
protective order entered under C.R.C.P. 242.41(e) restricts the disclosure of information or
when the Regulation Counsel otherwise determines that certain information should not be
disclosed to the complaining witness.
(3) The Regulation Counsel’s decision under subsection (b)(1) above is an exercise of
discretion that may take into account numerous factors, including the availability of
admissible and credible evidence to support the allegation, the presumptive form of
discipline provided by the American Bar Association Standards for Imposing Lawyer
Sanctions if the allegation is proven, and the likelihood that additional education of the
lawyer will address any concerns of future misconduct. The Regulation Counsel’s decision
under subsection (b)(1) above is final. The Regulation Counsel will inform the complaining witness of the decision. The complaining witness is not entitled to review or appeal of
that decision.
History
Source: Entire rule added and adopted May 20, 2021, effective for cases filed with the Presiding Disciplinary Judge or the Supreme Court on or after July 1, 2021, and, as to all other matters covered by these rules, effective July 1, 2021.
Provenance
- Source
- content.leg.colorado.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
66c28532933fdd93e742b3b1b7141ec7eb8a70c65070387317d2e6ae9b7ab432
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.