Bindinglaw

CO · rules

C.R.C.P. 232.24

Contempt Proceeding, Report, Objections, and Collections

activein force · 2022-12-15 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Prosecuting Authority. The Regulation Counsel will prosecute the contempt

proceeding.

(b) Contempt Procedures. A respondent in a contempt proceeding must be afforded

all procedural protections set forth in C.R.C.P. 107 and applicable law.

(1) First Appearance. The respondent must attend a first appearance. At the first

appearance, the special master must advise the respondent of the respondent’s rights under

C.R.C.P. 107(d) and set the matter for a contempt hearing.

(2) Contempt Hearing. The contempt hearing will go forward under C.R.C.P. 107.

Subject to any limitations in the order of reference, the special master may exercise in the

proceeding the powers generally reposed in a court under the Colorado Rules of Civil

Procedure, including C.R.C.P. 107.

(c) Report to Supreme Court, Objections, and Decision.

(1) Report of the Special Master. After a hearing the special master must report in

writing to the supreme court, setting forth findings of fact, conclusions of law, and

recommendations for remedial and/or punitive sanctions and the terms of those sanctions,

including whether the sanctions should be bifurcated. If the special master recommends a

sanction, the special master must, before issuing a report, afford the respondent the right to

make a statement in mitigation under C.R.C.P. 107(b) or C.R.C.P. 107(d)(1), as applicable.

Under C.R.C.P. 107(e), if the special master recommends both remedial and punitive

sanctions, appropriate procedures must be followed as to each type of sanction, and

findings must be made to support the adjudication of both types of sanctions. When

submitting a report to the supreme court, the special master must transmit the record of the

entire proceeding to the supreme court and mail a copy of the report to each party.

(2) Objections. Objections to the special master’s report are governed by C.R.C.P.

232.20(b)-(d).

(3) Supreme Court Decision. The supreme court may adopt, modify, or reject the

special master’s report and will determine as a matter of law whether the respondent

engaged in contemptuous conduct that was offensive to the authority and the dignity of the

supreme court. If the supreme court finds that the respondent engaged in contemptuous

conduct, the supreme court may impose a fixed sentence of imprisonment not to exceed six

months, restitution, an unconditional fine of $2,000 to $10,000 per incident, or assessment

of costs as allowed by law, or any combination thereof under C.R.C.P. 107(e). If the

supreme court finds contemptuous conduct but does not impose imprisonment, the supreme court will impose a fine between $2,000 and $10,000 for each incident of contempt,

payable to the supreme court, and may order restitution or assessment of costs as allowed

by law. The supreme court may also order related remedial sanctions. The clerk of the

supreme court must mail a copy of the order to each party and to the special master.

(4) Remand to Special Master. If the supreme court finds that the respondent engaged

in contemptuous conduct and concludes that a sentence of imprisonment is appropriate, the

supreme court will remand the matter to the special master with instructions to issue the

mittimus and to take the respondent into custody in accordance with the procedures of that

court of record.

(d) Collection of Restitution.

(1) Notice of Intent and Withdrawal of Notice. A person in whose name a restitution

order has been entered under this rule has the right to pursue collection of the amount of

restitution owed to that person. A person who wishes to collect restitution under this

subsection must first deliver to the clerk of the supreme court a notice of intent to pursue

collection. On receiving such a notice, the supreme court and the Regulation Counsel will

cease all attempts to collect the restitution amounts due to that person. A person may

withdraw a notice of intent to pursue collection of restitution by filing a notice of

withdrawal with the clerk of the supreme court. The notice must state the amount, if any,

of restitution collected. On receiving a notice of withdrawal, the supreme court and the

Regulation Counsel may resume pursuing collection of restitution under this section.

(2) Procedure. A person who has filed a notice of intent to pursue collection of

restitution may request that the supreme court issue any of the following without cost:

(A) One or more certified copies of the transcript for the order for restitution, which

may be recorded with a clerk and recorder or with the secretary of state;

(B) An order that a portion of the respondent’s earnings be withheld under C.R.S.

section 16-18.5-105(3)(b); and

(C) A writ of execution, writ of attachment, or other civil process to collect on a

judgment under article 52 of title 13, C.R.S.

(e) Enforcement of Punitive Sanctions. The Regulation Counsel may pursue a subsequent contempt citation with the supreme court if the respondent fails to pay the fine

imposed as a punitive sanction. In such instances, the Regulation Counsel may pursue the

contempt citation without authorization of the Regulation Committee.

History

Source: Entire rule adopted and effective December 15, 2022 (Rule Change 2022(17)). Part VI. General Provisions

Provenance

Source
content.leg.colorado.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-15
Content hash
e2c703e5bdac95f804d917b88fd279bb680e97cf3c50124f788faea092f43fad
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.