Bindinglaw

CO · rules

C.R.C.P. 232.18

Prehearing Matters

activein force · 2022-12-15 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Dispositive Motions. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge may decide dispositive

motions, including those filed under C.R.C.P. 12 and 56. The decision is subject to supreme

court review when the Presiding Disciplinary Judge submits a report to the supreme court

under C.R.C.P. 232.20.

(b) Discovery.

(1) Scope. C.R.C.P. 26 applies where not inconsistent with this rule. C.R.C.P. 16 does

not apply to proceedings under this rule.

(2) Disclosures. Disclosures are due no later than 28 days after the answer is filed.

(A) Each party must disclose:

(i) The name and, if known, the address, telephone number, and email address of each

individual likely to have discoverable information relevant to the claims and defenses of

any party and a brief description of the specific information that each such individual is

known or believed to possess;

(ii) A listing, together with a copy or a description by category, of the subject matter

and location of all documents, data compilations, and tangible things in the possession,

custody, or control of the party that are relevant to the claims and defenses of any party;

and

(iii) A statement as to whether the party plans to use expert witnesses and, if so, the

experts’ fields of expertise.

(B) The Regulation Counsel must disclose fines requested and a computation of any

restitution sought.

(3) Expert Witnesses. The parties must exchange expert witness reports, if any, at least

56 days (8 weeks) before the hearing, or as otherwise ordered by the Presiding Disciplinary

Judge. A report must contain the elements required by the applicable Colorado Rules of

Civil Procedure.

(4) Limitations. Except by order of the Presiding Disciplinary Judge for good cause

shown, and subject to the proportionality factors in C.R.C.P. 26(b)(1), discovery is limited

as follows:

(A) The Regulation Counsel may take one deposition of the respondent and of two

other persons in addition to depositions of experts as provided in C.R.C.P. 26. The

respondent may take three depositions in addition to depositions of experts as provided in

C.R.C.P. 26. Depositions are generally governed by C.R.C.P. 26, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 45,

unless otherwise inconsistent with this rule. A record must be made of depositions.

(B) Written interrogatories, requests for production of documents, and requests for

admission are governed by C.R.C.P. 26(b)(2), 33, 34, and 36, unless otherwise inconsistent

with this rule.

(C) Interview notes created as part of the preliminary investigation under C.R.C.P.

232.9 are deemed to be prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial under the work

product doctrine.

(5) Modifying the Scope of Discovery. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge may modify

discovery limitations in accordance with C.R.C.P. 26(b)(2)(F).

(6) Supplementation of Discovery. A party must supplement disclosures, responses,

and expert reports and statements in accordance with C.R.C.P. 26(e).

(7) Sanctions. Under C.R.C.P. 37, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge may compel

discovery and impose sanctions for failure to comply with discovery obligations.

(c) Subpoenas. The clerk of the Presiding Disciplinary Judge must issue a subpoena

under C.R.C.P. 45(a)(2), signed but otherwise in blank, to a party who requests it. That

party must complete it before service. A lawyer who has entered an appearance in the case

also may issue, complete, and sign a subpoena as an officer of the court. Challenges to

subpoenas must be directed to the Presiding Disciplinary Judge. The Presiding Disciplinary

Judge may hold in contempt under C.R.C.P. 45(f) any person who fails or refuses, without

adequate excuse, to comply with a subpoena.

History

Source: Entire rule and Comment adopted and effective December 15, 2022 (Rule Change 2022(17)). COMMENT Although C.R.C.P. 232.18 allows for discov- ery consistent with civil practice under C.R.C.P. 26, the supreme court adopts this provision with the expectation that in many UPL cases the parties will not need to make use of the full scope of allowable discovery.

Provenance

Source
content.leg.colorado.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-15
Content hash
646ad399488b30a7bfb2e30c5f381831ef73116fb3e39ebc0658f736c7a9be52
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
C.R.C.P. 232.18 — Prehearing Matters · binding.law