Bindinglaw

CO · rules

C.R.C.P. 232.13

Interim Injunction

activein force · 2022-12-15 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Overview. Although respondents can be permanently enjoined from the unauthorized practice of law only under the civil injunction procedures set forth in C.R.C.P. 232.14

through C.R.C.P. 232.20, the supreme court may temporarily enjoin a respondent from the

unauthorized practice of law while a civil injunction proceeding is pending against the

respondent if there is reasonable cause to believe that the respondent is causing substantial

public or private harm by engaging in a sustained pattern of UPL activities.

(b) Procedure.

(1) Initiation. To initiate a proceeding under this section 232.13, the Regulation

Counsel, with the concurrence of the Chair or Vice-Chair of the Regulation Committee,

must file a petition with the supreme court alleging that a respondent is engaging in a

sustained pattern of the unauthorized practice of law that is causing substantial public or

private harm. The petition must be supported by an affidavit setting forth facts sufficient to

give rise to reasonable cause to believe that the alleged conduct occurred. The Regulation

Counsel must serve a copy of the petition and affidavit on the respondent. Service of

process is sufficient when made in accordance with C.R.C.P. 4. Proof of service must be

made as provided in C.R.C.P. 4(h).

(2) Response. The respondent must file a response within 14 days after service.

(3) Hearing. If the respondent responds to the petition, either party may request a

hearing. The supreme court may refer the matter to the Presiding Disciplinary Judge for

resolution of contested factual matters and a hearing, for which subpoenas may be issued

under C.R.C.P. 45. A hearing will take place within 14 days of the order of referral.

(4) Report. Within 7 days after any hearing, or as soon as practicable if no hearing is

held, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge will submit to the supreme court a report setting

forth findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a recommendation as to an interim injunction.

(5) Decision. After considering the petition, any response, and any report from the

Presiding Disciplinary Judge, the supreme court may issue an interim injunction; deny the

petition; or issue any other appropriate order.

(6) Subsequent Civil Injunction Proceeding.

(i) Filing of Petition. When the supreme court issues an interim injunction and a

petition has not already been filed under C.R.C.P. 232.15 based on the same conduct, the

Regulation Counsel must promptly file a petition against the respondent under C.R.C.P.

232.15. C.R.C.P. 232.12 does not apply to such proceedings. The proceeding will then go

forward as otherwise provided in this rule.

(ii) Accelerated Disposition. A respondent subject to an interim injunction under this

section 232.13 may exercise the right to an accelerated disposition of the civil injunction

proceeding by filing a notice to that effect with the Presiding Disciplinary Judge. The

matter then must proceed without appreciable delay.

(iii) Termination of Interim Injunction. An interim injunction under this section 232.13

terminates on resolution of a civil injunctive proceeding based on the same underlying

conduct, or as the supreme court otherwise may order.

History

Source: Entire rule adopted and effective December 15, 2022 (Rule Change 2022(17)). Part IV. Civil Injunction Proceedings

Provenance

Source
content.leg.colorado.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-15
Edition
2026-09-15
Content hash
9ba6218c3642feda9277995cd650b09223c901fd0a0f7e802523ccd652e2cbac
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.