CO · rules
C.R.C.P. 211.1
Access to Information Concerning Proceedings Under Chapter 18
(1) Except as otherwise authorized by C.R.C.P. 209.4(2) or order of the Supreme
Court, all other information contained in the application, and all admissions proceedings
conducted pursuant to C.R.C.P. 208 through 209 prior to the filing of any written
exceptions with the clerk of the Supreme Court, shall be confidential and requests for such
information shall be denied by the Office of the Presiding Disciplinary Judge and the
Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel, hearing boards, inquiry panels, and committees,
unless the request is made by:
(a) An agency authorized to investigate the qualifications of persons for admission to
practice law;
(b) An agency authorized to investigate the qualifications of persons for government
employment;
(c) An attorney regulation or discipline enforcement agency;
(d) A law enforcement agency;
(e) An agency authorized to investigate the qualifications of judicial candidates; or
(f) The Colorado Lawyer Assistance Program, or another jurisdiction’s similar program.
Upon a showing of good cause, the Supreme Court may enter an order that seals all or
part of the record of proceedings at the Supreme Court level.
(2) Public Proceedings. Except as otherwise provided by the Supreme Court, the
record, pleadings and all proceedings before the Supreme Court shall become public upon
the filing of written exceptions.
History
Source: Entire rule added and effective September 1, 2014.
Provenance
- Source
- content.leg.colorado.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
1a5a7c3c19e2de976070b92cf20dbe361630e01d1981e5cfaa6b93e750f4dac1
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.