CO · rules
C.R.C.P. 209.3
Pre-Hearing Matters
(1) Issues to Be Presented. The issues at the hearing shall be limited to those in the
inquiry panel findings and challenged in the applicant’s request for a hearing unless, prior
to the hearing, the Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel requests the inquiry panel to
reopen its determination to consider additional information, and amend its findings. A
request to reopen the inquiry panel’s determination shall stay the proceeding before the
hearing board until the inquiry panel has completed its review.
(2) Status Conference. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge or presiding officer shall
order an initial status conference to be held within fourteen days after the filing of the
request for a hearing. The purpose of the initial status conference is for the Presiding
Disciplinary Judge or presiding officer and the parties to discuss any need for disclosures,
discovery, or expert witnesses, and to manage all matters relating to the proceeding. After
the initial status conference, the applicant shall be notified by written order of:
(a) The date, time, and place of the hearing;
(b) The right of the applicant to be represented by counsel at such hearing at the
applicant’s expense, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, to produce evidence bearing
upon the applicant’s character and fitness to practice law, and to make reasonable use of
the subpoena powers of the Presiding Disciplinary Judge or the judge’s clerk for the
proceedings.
(3) Discovery.
(a) Purpose and Scope. C.R.C.P. 16 shall not apply to proceedings conducted pursuant to this rule except as otherwise provided in this rule. C.R.C.P. 26 shall apply to
proceedings conducted pursuant to this rule except as otherwise provided in this rule.
(b) Limitations. Except upon order by the Presiding Disciplinary Judge or the presiding officer for good cause shown, discovery shall be limited as follows:
(i) The Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel may take the deposition of the applicant
and two other persons, in addition to the depositions of experts as provided in C.R.C.P. 26.
The applicant may take the deposition of three persons, in addition to the depositions of
experts as provided in C.R.C.P. 26. The scope and manner of proceeding by way of
deposition and the use thereof shall otherwise be governed by C.R.C.P. 26, 28 through 32,
and 45.
(ii) On motion of the Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel, and upon a showing of
good cause, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge or presiding officer may require the applicant
to submit to a mental status examination conducted by a psychiatrist or psychologist, or to
submit to a substance abuse evaluation conducted by a qualified professional. The psychiatrist, psychologist or substance abuse evaluator shall be chosen by the Office of Attorney
Regulation Counsel. The applicant shall bear the cost of the required mental status
examination and/or substance abuse evaluation.
(c) Duty to Disclose Expert Testimony. The parties must disclose expert testimony as
required by C.R.C.P. 26. The timing of any expert witness disclosures and supplementation
shall be as directed by the written order of the Presiding Disciplinary Judge or presiding
officer.
(4) Additional Conferences. The parties may request additional status conferences as
needed.
History
Source: Entire rule added and effective September 1, 2014.
Provenance
- Source
- content.leg.colorado.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
90088641acef5781efe72b81fad8f5fa93659ecc811ed8adf652287220d10373
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.