CO · rules
C.R.C.P. 407 (County Court)
Remedial and Punitive Sanctions for Contempt
(a) Definitions.
(1) Contempt. Disorderly or disruptive behavior, a breach of the peace, boisterous
conduct or violent disturbance toward the court, or conduct that unreasonably interrupts the
due course of judicial proceedings; behavior that obstructs the administration of justice;
disobedience or resistance by any person to or interference with any lawful writ, process,
or order of the court; or any other act or omission designated as contempt by the statutes
or these rules.
(2) Direct Contempt. Contempt that the court has seen or heard and is so extreme that
no warning is necessary or that has been repeated despite the court’s warning to desist.
(3) Indirect Contempt. Contempt that occurs out of the direct sight or hearing of the
court.
(4) Punitive Sanctions for Contempt. Punishment by unconditional fine, fixed sentence of imprisonment, or both, for conduct that is found to be offensive to the authority
and dignity of the court.
(5) Remedial Sanctions for Contempt. Sanctions imposed to force compliance with
a lawful order or to compel performance of an act within the person’s power or present
ability to perform.
(6) Court. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘court’’ means any judge, magistrate, commissioner, referee, or a master while performing official duties.
(b) Direct Contempt Proceedings. When a direct contempt is committed, it may be
punished summarily. In such case an order shall be made on the record or in writing
reciting the facts constituting the contempt, including a description of the person’s conduct,
a finding that the conduct was so extreme that no warning was necessary or the person’s
conduct was repeated after the court’s warning to desist, and a finding that the conduct is
offensive to the authority and dignity of the court. Prior to the imposition of sanctions, the
person shall have the right to make a statement in mitigation.
(c) Indirect Contempt Proceedings. When it appears to the court by motion supported by affidavit that indirect contempt has been committed, the court may ex parte
order a citation to issue to the person so charged to appear and show cause at a date, time
and place designated why the person should not be punished. The citation and a copy of
the motion, affidavit and order shall be served directly upon such person at least 21 days
before the time designated for the person to appear. If such person fails to appear at the
time so designated, and it is evident to the court that the person was properly served with
copies of the motion, affidavit, order, and citation, a warrant for the person’s arrest may
issue to the sheriff. The warrant shall fix the date, time and place for the production of the
person in court. The court shall state on the warrant the amount and kind of bond required.
The person shall be discharged upon delivery to and approval by the sheriff or clerk of the
bond directing the person to appear at the date, time and place designated in the warrant,
and at any time to which the hearing may be continued, or pay the sum specified. If the
person fails to appear at the time designated in the warrant, or at any time to which the
hearing may be continued, the bond may be forfeited upon proper notice of hearing to the
surety, if any, and to the extent of the damages suffered because of the contempt, the bond
may be paid to the aggrieved party. If the person fails to make bond, the sheriff shall keep
the person in custody subject to the order of the court.
(d) Trial and Punishment. (1) Punitive Sanctions. In an indirect contempt proceeding where punitive sanctions may be imposed, the court may appoint special counsel
to prosecute the contempt action. If the judge initiates the contempt proceedings, the
person shall be advised of the right to have the action heard by another judge. At the first
appearance, the person shall be advised of the right to be represented by an attorney and,
if indigent and if a jail sentence is contemplated, the court will appoint counsel. The
maximum jail sentence shall not exceed six months unless the person has been advised of
the right to a jury trial. The person shall also be advised of the right to plead either guilty
or not guilty to the charges, the presumption of innocence, the right to require proof of the
charge beyond a reasonable doubt, the right to present witnesses and evidence, the right to
cross-examine all adverse witnesses, the right to have subpoenas issued to compel attendance of witnesses at trial, the right to remain silent, the right to testify at trial, and the
right to appeal any adverse decision. The court may impose a fine or imprisonment or both
if the court expressly finds that the person’s conduct was offensive to the authority and
dignity of the court. The person shall have the right to make a statement in mitigation prior
to the imposition of sentence.
(2) Remedial Sanctions. In a contempt proceeding where remedial sanctions may be
imposed, the court shall hear and consider the evidence for and against the person charged
and it may find the person in contempt and order sanctions. The court shall enter an order
in writing or on the record describing the means by which the person may purge the
contempt and the sanctions that will be in effect until the contempt is purged. In all cases
of indirect contempt where remedial sanctions are sought, the nature of the sanctions and
remedies that may be imposed shall be described in the motion or citation. Costs and
reasonable attorney’s fees in connection with the contempt proceeding may be assessed in
the discretion of the court. If the contempt consists of the failure to perform an act in the
power of the person to perform and the court finds the person has the present ability to
perform the act so ordered, the person may be fined or imprisoned until its performance.
(e) Limitations. The court shall not suspend any part of a punitive sanction based
upon the performance or non-performance of any future acts. The court may reconsider
any punitive sanction. Probation shall not be permitted as a condition of any punitive
sanction. Remedial and punitive sanctions may be combined by the court, provided
appropriate procedures are followed relative to each type of sanction and findings are made
to support the adjudication of both types of sanctions.
(f) Appeal. For the purposes of appeal, an order deciding the issue of contempt and
sanctions shall be final.
History
Source: Entire rule amended January 26, 1995, effective April 1, 1995; (c) amended and adopted December 14, 2011, effective January 1, 2012, for all cases pending on or filed on or after January 1, 2012, pursuant to C.R.C.P. 1(b).
Provenance
- Source
- content.leg.colorado.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-15
- Edition
- 2026-09-15
- Content hash
758d3395c728f5539eb3b242308b4458ad71673e08e4e8da33e03fe58fed17f8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.